My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 04242023
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2023
>
CCP 04242023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2023 2:23:03 PM
Creation date
4/26/2023 2:21:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
4/24/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
295
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, April 10, 2023 <br />Page 12 <br />488 solve a problem with the wrong answer. Having heard this and not having any hard <br />489 data about how many arrests the City has had or how many cases inspected, he does <br />490 not favor a cap right now. <br />491 <br />492 Mayor Roe asked if Councilmember Groff would want to go away from a cap of <br />493 twenty-four. <br />494 <br />495 Councilmember Groff indicated that was correct. <br />496 <br />497 Councilmember Etten agreed with much of what Councilmember Groff said but he <br />498 was not sure about no cap. He was not prepared to reduce the number at this time <br />499 for reasons that have been stated by multiple people. He appreciated giving addi- <br />500 tional tools to staff and the Police Department to ensure that there are quality, safe <br />501 businesses and that the people in the businesses are healthy and safe. <br />502 <br />503 Councilmember Strahan stated she wanted to echo Mr. HessÓs concern that a charge <br />504 should not equal a revocation. The one transfer in a five-year period she struggles <br />505 with and she is not in a position to change the cap, also because she does not feel <br />506 comfortable adding additional for one business right now because that certainly can <br />507 be seen as preferential because they came forward and were the loudest. She was <br />508 comfortable with leaving the cap where it is right now but wants it to be known that <br />509 it does not include clinics or chiropractic massage and that the City is not forcing <br />510 fourteen businesses to close. The goal would be to eventually get down to a cap of <br />511 ten or whatever the cap would be. <br />512 <br />513 Councilmember Schroeder explained she was glad to hear that everyone was in <br />514 support of stricter regulations and thought the City could actually end up doing <br />515 better law enforcement with the stricter regulations. She was very much in favor <br />516 of the stronger regulations and maybe even to go further on some of that. She was <br />517 a little concerned about the transferring piece because she did not think any other <br />518 type of business is restricted by that. She thought limiting the number seemed ar- <br />519 bitrary. She was all for having well established good businesses come into Rose- <br />520 ville and appreciated the thought about owner operators being in a separate <br />521 class. But she did think limiting the number would help to lessen the bad <br />522 businesses, and stricter regulations will help. She indicated she is struggling with <br />523 the cap as well. <br />524 <br />525 Mayor Roe indicated he joined with Councilmember Groff and probably being the <br />526 most radical about the cap in terms of not having one. He has raised this question <br />527 throughout the process; what is this tool solving. He thought the Council heard <br />528 very much from people in the industry that everything else the City is trying to do <br />529 with the Ordinance is aimed at and will likely be successful to a greater degree <br />530 in terms of resolving the issues that are out there in the industry than the cap. <br />531 He personally will go along with what the Council agrees on regarding the cap <br />but he is against keeping a cap. He thought it seemed that the majority of the <br />Council <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.