Laserfiche WebLink
the Commission with federal, state, county, and regional entities because so much <br />of what the Commission does is connected to other bodies and it is not really a <br />Roseville decision. It almost always involves some other entity. She thought that <br />language is valuable to keep a highlight on the fact that the Commission needs to <br />look beyond just Roseville borders, especially when it comes to environment, <br />transportation and those sort of things, but environment in particular is not local, it <br />is very much broader than that. <br />Member Hodder agreed. He liked the overall intent of this as well and he thought <br />Member Misra's point is very well taken. He would support leaving the crossed - <br />out point in somewhere in this. <br />Member Cicha indicated he liked the word collaborate that was used in C and D. <br />His suggestion would be instead of "maintain an interest in and an understanding <br />of," he would change it to "Collaborate with federal, state, county, regional, and <br />other public works, environmental, and transportation services that impact City <br />services." He thought that was a good way of summing up how the Commission <br />interacts with those organizations. He liked the additions of the new C, D, and E <br />and felt these were appropriate and thought making a recommendation to the City <br />Council today would also be appropriate. It is a recommendation, and the Council <br />will look at it and make their own edits as well. He thought this is a good <br />framework to hand the Council. <br />The Commission concurred. <br />Chair Ficek summarized discussion of the Council. He thought that new Item C <br />could read: "Collaborate with City staff, and federal, state, county, regional, other <br />public works, as needed...". <br />Member Misra indicated new Item C is only regarding sustainability and <br />management of environmental resources. <br />Chair Ficek indicated the reworked sentence would also be added into Item D as <br />well so it would cover both of those in order to not only collaborate with City staff <br />but to also capture other agencies. <br />Member Misra indicated she would consider going with the new Items C, D and E <br />and then just move it further down and change the verb from Maintain an interest <br />in and an understanding to collaborate but leave the rest of that as a separate Item <br />F and then move Item F to Item G. <br />The Commission agreed. <br />Motion <br />Member Hodder moved, Member Luongo seconded, to recommend the City <br />Council the proposed changes in 206.2: Scope, Duties and Functions. <br />Page 7 of 8 <br />