Laserfiche WebLink
213 <br />214 Mr. Freihammer noted the City Council did initiate a review of the Commissions. <br />215 The City Council will discuss this at their April 24, 2023 meeting. <br />216 <br />217 Chair Ficek reviewed the proposed changes on how to take the four scope, duties <br />218 and functions of the Commission and change them into some other things or a <br />219 different way to look at them. He indicated the first two remain the same, the <br />220 highlighted portion is the change in name of the Commission. He explained the <br />221 interest and understanding of the other regions is crossed out but will not prevent <br />222 the Commission of doing it but does not need to be listed as a part of the scope of <br />223 the Commission. The next three proposed changes in red are the new ones, <br />224 "Collaborate with City staff to review, evaluate and develop policies and practices <br />225 regarding sustainability and management of environmental resources." <br />226 "Collaborate with City staff to review, evaluate and develop policies and practices <br />227 regarding transportation infrastructure as it relates to the multi -model needs and <br />228 demands of the community. This includes related public safety issues and <br />229 coordination with the Traffic Safety Committee if necessary." And "Engage with <br />230 the Roseville community and serve as a community liaison for issues, ideas and <br />231 proposals while providing appropriate feedback." He indicated the last duties and <br />232 functions item would remain the same. He asked for staff and Commission <br />233 feedback and discussion. <br />234 <br />235 Mr. Freihammer indicated offhand it seemed like good suggestions to him. He <br />236 thought having the traffic safety is there. He reviewed what the Traffic Safety <br />237 Committee does in the City. <br />238 <br />239 Member Collins thought everything looked great and omitting the one part was <br />240 reasonable and if the Commission wanted to still look at that it could do so. <br />241 IF <br />242 Member Luongo asked what the Ordinance says that is referenced in the crossed <br />243 out part (ORD.1313,12.6.2004). <br />244 <br />245 Mr. Freihammer explained all of section 206 is what the existing public works is. <br />246 He thought the ordinance is just referencing them working with other agencies. He <br />247 agreed that is kind of inherent with the job and could be listed but the City, as a <br />248 whole, is always working with outside agencies. <br />249 <br />250 Chair Ficek explained if the Commission went this route he assumed it would <br />251 reference some ordinances once finalized. <br />252 <br />253 Mr. Freihammer indicated that was correct. He indicated if the Commission <br />254 recommended something to the City Council, the Council would more than likely <br />255 have to amend Chapter 206 as an Ordinance change. <br />256 <br />257 Member Misra indicated she liked it as well. She thought what was still valuable to <br />258 keep and helpful for the Commission is to have some sort of language that connects <br />Page 6 of 8 <br />Page 10 of 185 <br />