My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2023_0410
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2023
>
CC_Minutes_2023_0410
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2023 4:23:30 PM
Creation date
5/9/2023 4:23:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/10/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,April 10,2023 <br /> Page 12 <br /> Mayor Roe asked if Councilmember Groff would want to go away from a cap of <br /> twenty-four. <br /> Councilmember Groff indicated that was correct. <br /> Councilmember Etten agreed with much of what Councilmember Groff said but he <br /> was not sure about no cap. He was not prepared to reduce the number at this time <br /> for reasons that have been stated by multiple people. He appreciated giving addi- <br /> tional tools to staff and the Police Department to ensure that there are quality, safe <br /> businesses and that the people in the businesses are healthy and safe. <br /> Councilmember Strahan stated she wanted to echo Mr.Hess's concern that a charge <br /> should not equal a revocation. The one transfer in a five-year period she struggles <br /> with and she is not in a position to change the cap, also because she does not feel <br /> comfortable adding additional for one business right now because that certainly can <br /> be seen as preferential because they came forward and were the loudest. She was <br /> comfortable with leaving the cap where it is right now but wants it to be known that <br /> it does not include clinics or chiropractic massage and that the City is not forcing <br /> fourteen businesses to close. The goal would be to eventually get down to a cap of <br /> ten or whatever the cap would be. <br /> Councilmember Schroeder explained she was glad to hear that everyone was in <br /> support of stricter regulations and thought the City could actually end up doing <br /> better law enforcement with the stricter regulations. She was very much in favor <br /> of the stronger regulations and maybe even to go further on some of that. She was <br /> a little concerned about the transferring piece because she did not think any other <br /> type of business is restricted by that. She thought limiting the number seemed ar- <br /> bitrary. She was all for having well established good businesses come into Rose- <br /> ville and appreciated the thought about owner operators being in a separate class. <br /> But she did think limiting the number would help to lessen the bad businesses, and <br /> stricter regulations will help. She indicated she is struggling with the cap as well. <br /> Mayor Roe indicated he joined with Councilmember Groff and probably being the <br /> most radical about the cap in terms of not having one. He has raised this question <br /> throughout the process; what is this tool solving. He thought the Council heard <br /> very much from people in the industry that everything else the City is trying to do <br /> with the Ordinance is aimed at and will likely be successful to a greater degree in <br /> terms of resolving the issues that are out there in the industry than the cap. He <br /> personally will go along with what the Council agrees on regarding the cap but he <br /> is against keeping a cap. He thought it seemed that the majority of the Council <br /> agrees not moving the cap to ten and perhaps the Council could talk about whether <br /> to keep the existing cap in place or not. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.