My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2023_0417
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2023
>
CC_Minutes_2023_0417
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2023 4:26:39 PM
Creation date
5/9/2023 4:26:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/17/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,April 17, 2023 <br /> Page 6 <br /> Ms. Davis indicated her company can add a lot of things, but it is important to stay <br /> more focused than the Council probably wants to because otherwise there will be <br /> too many criteria to compare. <br /> Ms.Davis reviewed the Abdo Position Scoring Methodology with the City Council. <br /> She asked for the City Council to start discussion on these topics and she would <br /> note any information the Council felt was needed for this study. <br /> Ms. Olson suggested the Council think about what the next bullet point would be <br /> and what the primary employee behavior to be motivated is. Is the Council looking <br /> for Roseville to really be that destination city, does the Council want to focus on <br /> turnover in order to attract people into the City, are there some positions that, as <br /> looking at the organization as a whole, that the Council really wants to make sure <br /> the workforce does not have a large turnover or what is that come into play when <br /> thinking about the philosophy and how the Council wants to position themselves. <br /> Mayor Roe appreciated bringing up that nuance because that was something in the <br /> compensation study being done on a non-profit board he was on. He noted one of <br /> the questions the consultant specifically asked was, you do not have to be the same <br /> in all different positions at all different levels of the organization. He thought the <br /> more range in a department or within a group of positions,the better. He stated the <br /> City may want to be more of a destination for some positions while not for others <br /> because the City may want longevity, someone who will be there awhile and has <br /> maybe one more step in their career. He thought it was important that the City <br /> thinks in those terms, noting it may be <br /> difficult for the City Council to say where certain positions should be because the <br /> Council does not know all of the details. But to the extent that the Council can try <br /> to articulate where the City wants to be in some of those variety of different areas, <br /> is where he would try to come from. <br /> Councilmember Etten asked as the City Council looks at this, will they be looking <br /> at each position description and range and he did not think that should be happen- <br /> ing. Ms. Davis concurred. <br /> Councilmember Etten explained he was on the Council during the last <br /> Compensation Study and the City arrived at what looks, in this discussion, to be a <br /> bit peculiar in ninety-seven to one hundred percent of average. He wondered if a <br /> range like 95%to 105%is better because it allows for some of that nuance and then <br /> the administrative staff can see some positions that may work better at ninety-five <br /> percent and other positions sitting at one hundred five percent. He asked if that is <br /> more of the range discussion the Council should be thinking about and philosophy. <br /> Ms. Davis explained there are a couple of things to consider. Because of the <br /> Minnesota pay equity rules, the City is not going to get to position each role <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.