My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2023_0424
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2023
>
CC_Minutes_2023_0424
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2023 4:15:02 PM
Creation date
5/23/2023 4:14:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/24/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, April 24, 2023 <br /> Page 14 <br /> Councilmember Strahan wanted to make it clear to the public that the regulations <br /> are already in effect and the Council is just adjusting and making amendments to <br /> an existing structure within the City. <br /> Mayor Roe explained the Council talked about changing exception number two in <br /> 309.03 and he thought there was still a bit of a problem with it, which is the <br /> reference to being licensed by the Board of Medical Practice. That is because when <br /> looking at the different types of practices that are listed, these are actually licensed <br /> by specific boards for those practices, such as physical therapy. He was double <br /> checking the language in State Statute about that because he wanted to be sure. He <br /> thought the Council may want to change it to say something to the effect of <br /> "licensed by a State Board governing the medical practice", and then may actually <br /> want to look at actual listings of specific practices. <br /> Councilmember Strahan asked if it should say "a Minnesota State Board" as <br /> opposed to just"a State Board". <br /> Mayor Roe thought because the City was in Minnesota that would be apparent,but <br /> he deferred comment to City Attorney Tierney. <br /> City Attorney Tierney thought when she wrote this, the other licenses all fell into <br /> the Department of Health, which is the issuing authority. But for medical doctors, <br /> it is actually the Board of Medical Practice and that is why she singled out the Board <br /> of Medical Practice. <br /> Mayor Roe liked the fact that the practices are still listed. <br /> Mr.Trudgeon indicated he meant to remove those when he made his edits.He noted <br /> Attachment C, which is the clean version, does not have practices listed. <br /> Mayor Roe thought the notion of striking out the requirement that the treatment be <br /> administered on the premises of a medical of health business, which is under the <br /> City's exemptions, does not seem to allow that exempted behavior to happen in <br /> people's homes. He asked if the Council was okay with striking out that it has to <br /> be on medical premises. <br /> The Council agreed to strike out that wording. <br /> Mayor Roe summarized the changes during this discussion were that transfer was <br /> removed altogether and the Council wants to look at adding the wording"in public <br /> view", on 309.06a and on 309.06b, noting the Council could leave"police officer" <br /> in or replace that with"City enforcement official". <br /> Mr. Trudgeon explained the wording could be that or"representative of the issuing <br /> authority or designee or City Police Department"in 309.06c. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.