My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2023_0424
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2023
>
CC_Minutes_2023_0424
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2023 4:15:02 PM
Creation date
5/23/2023 4:14:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/24/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,April 24, 2023 <br /> Page 18 <br /> Commission most excites you or do you feel you can contribute to the most". He <br /> suggested something along those lines because it gets to the work of the <br /> Commission so people can show understanding of what that Commission does, <br /> maybe what the person is passionate about,and why the person would be doing that <br /> versus asking what the Commission should be doing. He appreciated the potential <br /> question list and felt that was good. He did not feel the Council should always be <br /> frozen by that but should start with that as the initial framing. <br /> Councilmember Strahan agreed with Councilmember Etten in order to show their <br /> understanding. She thought it was nice to send out the information in advance to <br /> have a good understanding of what the Commission does. She noted one question <br /> that came up a couple of times that she thought was concerning was "how would <br /> you change..."because she did not want to usurp the leadership of the department <br /> heads and make it seem like somehow the Commissioners had an authority over <br /> staff to make changes that they could not actually implement. <br /> Councilmember Schroeder thought part of this is when looking at the chapters that <br /> are written for each of the Commissions, some are not clear on what the <br /> Commission does. When someone does research on the Commission for the <br /> interview, the Council can see why some of the applicants' answers come across <br /> somewhat the way they are. She thought the City was going to think about <br /> recrafting how the descriptions are written. <br /> Mayor Roe stated it was helpful to make sure the materials the City gives to the <br /> prospective applicants are as good as possible in terms of how it relates to the scope, <br /> duties, and functions of the Commissions. <br /> Councilmember Etten thought the information given to the Commissioners is a <br /> tremendous improvement and so much better than what was available a year or two <br /> ago. <br /> Mayor Roe thought the big question regarding the interview process is the where, <br /> how, and when. He wondered if the interviews should be live or recorded. <br /> Councilmember Strahan explained she enjoyed being at Cedarholm,but it has a lot <br /> to do with her saying there are a lot of City spaces and an opportunity to go out into <br /> the spaces and be a part of them. She thought in that space, there is the opportunity <br /> for recording the interviews. She stated it has been good to pull the interviews out <br /> of the City business because it gives the individual more dedicated time than when <br /> on zoom. She appreciated the extra day outside of the Council meetings, liked <br /> having the interviews elsewhere, noting it reminds people that there are other City <br /> buildings. <br /> Councilmember Schroeder liked the idea of doing the interviews separate from the <br /> Council meetings and thought it makes it less stressful. She did not like going to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.