Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Freihammer indicated that was correct. The City usually gets a lot more <br />requests than what staff can move around the city and as staff has learned that is <br />done by avolunteer and does affectthe variability. He notedthere is one permanent <br />one on County Road B but the one advantage to moving them is that people get <br />used to them and ignore them, so it usually is good to rotate them with construction <br />projects for cut -through traffic in neighborhoods. <br />Member Mueller indicated when she has reached out to the County before <br />regarding the lack or visibility of speed limit signs on County Road B, as an <br />example, she has been told that there are limitations with the number and type of <br />signs that can be posted and that there has to be certain rights -of -way or distances <br />or whatever and different sign types. She asked if that was accurate and something <br />the City needed to consider for Roseville roads. <br />Mr. Freihammer explained only so many signs can be put up. The City's policy is <br />to make sure there is one speed limit sign every half or quarter mile or some sort of <br />stop intersection. He was not sure what the County's policy is, but speed limit signs <br />cannot be placed close together. <br />Mr. John Kysylyczyn, 3083 Victoria Street, provided background information on <br />the history of his political career and indicated he has taken an interest in this <br />subject. He explained he was opposed to the efforts to adjust the speed limits in the <br />city because he thought it was a complete waste of time and money. He pointed out <br />that he has noticed there is no ticket data. There is data as to the traffic stops, but <br />there is no data as to how many speeding tickets have been written and for what <br />speeds they have been written for. St. Paul disbanded its traffic unit so the idea that <br />the City will have more officers focusing on traffic is false and is actually going in <br />the opposite direction. Roseville has done local enforcement and the outcome of <br />the local enforcement efforts back twenty years ago was that the tickets and the <br />people that were being stopped were the people that lived in the neighborhood. <br />There is this rabbit hole he encouraged the Commission not to go down, which is <br />that slower driving leads to less injury. The problem is not the speed, the problem <br />is the distracted driving, the people that are reading their cellphones while driving <br />down the road and talking on the phone while driving down the road. That is where <br />the real problem lies. He would caution the Commission on studying data on what <br />other cities have done because some cities make decisions that are politically <br />driven, and some cities make decisions that are statistically driven. The cities of <br />Brooklyn Park and Minneapolis are political party -endorsed where a lot of their <br />decisions are based on politics. Shoreview, on the other hand, is not a political <br />party -endorsed city and often times a lot of decisions made there are based on <br />statistics. Another thing he wanted to raise caution about is passing laws that no <br />one follows. That is the scientific versus politics. When you pass laws that no one <br />follows people have atendency of not respecting other laws. Another thing to point <br />out is perhaps Roseville should stop paving local side streets that are four car lanes <br />wide. Perhaps for the next reconstruction phase, quit paving four lane -wide local <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />