My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2023_0605
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2023
>
CC_Minutes_2023_0605
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2023 3:58:09 PM
Creation date
6/21/2023 3:58:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/5/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 5,2023 <br /> Page 8 <br /> The Council concurred. <br /> Mayor Roe asked if the Council had any feedback on the existing application <br /> language questions or the reappointment application questions. <br /> Councilmember Strahan indicated she liked both sets of questions as they did a <br /> good job of differentiating. She would like to see one thing improved but was not <br /> sure how to do it and that was the Commission's preference. She noted there have <br /> been a number of people who have come to the Council and have a first and second <br /> choice but cannot decide which to choose. She would like a way for the choices to <br /> be narrowed down more. <br /> Mayor Roe thought that might be a question to ask the applicant, which <br /> Commission would be preferred. He thought some information could be provided <br /> ahead of time indicating if the candidate had a preference or changed their mind <br /> about which Commission to apply for, noting it could be communicated before the <br /> interview, which might be a way to handle that. He also thought about having the <br /> applicant fill out an application for each Commission a person wanted to be on but <br /> maybe it would make sense for a new applicant to answer Commission specific <br /> questions on the application. <br /> Mayor Roe indicated on the reappointment application questions, the fourth <br /> question, he thought about amending that a little bit. He explained his amendment <br /> suggestion would be"are there areas that can be improved to help the Commission <br /> do its work or to help Commissioners with their service on the Commission." <br /> Councilmember Strahan indicated she liked that but wanted to recommend that the <br /> Council put that into the interview. She thought it might be helpful to have"What <br /> is your definition of commitment", which can come across as a little bit charged. <br /> She thought that could be a part of the reappointment questions but needed to be <br /> softened a little bit. <br /> Councilmember Schroeder agreed and thought that could be part of the application <br /> question but she did not like the way it is worded. <br /> The Council discussed possible changes to the question. <br /> Councilmember Strahan asked if staff has considered asking people their pronouns. <br /> Ms. Olson indicated staff has not asked that as a preference on the application. As <br /> one of the choices under gender, there is non-binary listed as a choice. Staff does <br /> not ask pronouns but it could be included if a Council preference. <br /> Mayor Roe asked if the City asks that on employment applications. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.