My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023_0627_PWETCPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
202x
>
2023
>
2023_0627_PWETCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2023 11:36:02 AM
Creation date
6/29/2023 11:33:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/27/2023
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
34 Chair Ficek asked on the Hamline project if more lanes are going to be opened or <br />35 how will that work with the signals not working. <br />36 <br />37 Ms. Smith explained she asked the County that today and it was thought it would <br />38 be similar to what is there, but she indicated she was going to talk to them to see <br />39 what it looks like later in the week next week because she wondered if it could just <br />40 be pulled off to the side for Saturday because it sounds like it should be paved. <br />41 <br />42 Chair Ficek indicated he would not advocate for completely opening it up because <br />43 then it will introduce confusion as people are looking around and wondering who <br />44 is next so there is some benefit to having reduced lanes and an all way stop but the <br />45 northbound lane could be opened and maybe the southbound ramp, but he thought <br />46 the ramp could be left as one lane. <br />47 <br />48 Chair Ficek noted regarding Less Mow May, it was obvious that people are not <br />49 mowing so he wondered how the City will reach out to explain the Ordinance will <br />50 kickback in on June 1 sc <br />51 <br />52 Mr. Johnson explained staff has been working with communications and there are <br />53 plans set up to do more communication blasts later in the month of May. He <br />54 explained this is also on the City website. <br />55 <br />56 Chair Ficek asked if there will be a grace period. <br />57 <br />58 Mr. Johnson explained in talking with community development, just like last year, <br />59 there are repeat offenders and staff will contact those people first when complaints <br />60 start coming in. <br />61 <br />62 5. Council Request for Commission Review <br />63 Mayor Roe indicated he was filling in for Councilmember Etten. He reviewed the <br />64 subject background and what the City Council was asking of the Commission. <br />65 <br />66 Chair Ficek indicated the Commission reviewed this in March and the Commission <br />67 does actually have some things to recommend to the City Council and he would be <br />68 happy for the Commission to open it up again and take a look. One of his questions <br />69 though is in the packet there was the notion of how often a Commission should <br />70 meet and he wondered if everything was on the table to discuss. <br />71 <br />72 Mayor Roe explained it may be more relevant for some Commissions more than <br />73 others, but the Council did want to open it up to those kinds of things too, number <br />74 of members, frequency of meetings and that sort of thing, to make sure that the <br />75 Commissions are doing the work as a City. The Council is looking for feedback <br />76 on any and all questions or information the Commissions come up with. <br />77 <br />78 Chair Ficek indicated one thing the Commission discussed and put into their <br />79 recommendations was looking at public safety. It kind of falls under transportation <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />Page 4 of 125 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.