CC_Minutes_2023_0620 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,June 20,2023 Page 6 He also explained there is something in the economy that is called inflation,noting the project went from$240,000 to$900,000 very quickly and the project is still five years out. He wondered what is going to happen. He liked the thought from Councilmember Schroeder to put a cap on this. He also questioned the amount of traffic that is actually on Victoria, noting on the low end, there are 3.5 cars per minute twelve hours a day, twenty-four hours a day and he did not see that at all. He has talked to fifteen of his neighbors and nobody wants this project. This is not a community project; it is being pushed onto their laps and property is being taken away. He will be losing twenty-five feet of his front yard which puts him in jeopardy of a lot of different things. Mr. Lawrence Jackerman,2825 Victoria Street North Mr. Jackerman explained he only heard about this project a few months ago. He wondered if this is still involving the existing right-of-way or does it consist of considering the taking of private property. He noted he has not received a letter from the City regarding anything to do with that. He explained if the City planned on taking his property it will cost a lot of money because he lives in America where there is a bill of rights where the fifth amendment of the United States Constitution includes a provision known as the takings clause which states that private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation. This clause is intended to protect citizens from having their property taken by the Government without fair compensation. The Supreme Court has interpreted this clause to mean that the Government may take private property for public use only if it provides just compensation to the owner of the property. He explained he has not heard of any offer to pay for his front yard, and he did not want to lose any more trees either. Ms. Kofi Montzka,Victoria Street Ms. Montzka explained she read through the ninety-eight-page report on this project and nothing in it talked about the effect on the actual property owners who live on Victoria Street. She noted there was a petition from 2016 which was a long time ago and hardly any of the people who signed the petition actually live on Victoria Street. She noted she has a nineteen-year-old who is in diapers who is like a two-year-old and this is a safe place for them to live. She told her personal care attendant about this and the first thing out of her mouth was that her son was going to run away or get hit by a car because she has a ton of bushes that provide a buffer to the road. She explained she cannot even bring her son to another person's home because if there is a sidewalk or if he sees other houses, he walks away to their homes. She understood she is only one person and cannot ask the Government to make decisions for her only but she has heard that there will be no provisions for making things safe again on her property plus it will push up twenty-five feet so the pathway would be almost up to his bedroom, and it is terrible. She noted this will practically cut off her neighbors' garage at 3295 Victoria Street. She felt there has not been much attention paid to the people who actually live on the street. She would like the Council to have all of the information before voting and know exactly what the plan is going to be.