My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2023_0620
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2023
>
CC_Minutes_2023_0620
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2023 10:23:36 AM
Creation date
7/11/2023 10:23:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/10/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 20, 2023 <br /> Page 8 <br /> this time that there would be a need to acquire additional right-of-way from <br /> individual property owners. Certainly that could be a possibility, depending on the <br /> final plans, and that would not happen without further opportunity for public <br /> engagement and public input in that process. If that is the case, the City would be <br /> required to provide fair compensation. Actually what the City does per policy is to <br /> seek appraisals and if the increase to the value based on the improvement does not <br /> match what an assessment might be, the City actually limits its ability to assess a <br /> property on that basis. Absolutely there would be compensation for acquisition of <br /> right-of-way but as was noted by comments from the City's Public Works Director, <br /> currently there is no anticipation that there would be such acquisition. But, once <br /> again, that could change as the plans get more fleshed out. He noted the difference <br /> in the dollars the public was hearing was not a result of inflation. <br /> Mayor Roe indicated the anticipated project total cost is the same either way, the <br /> difference is where the dollars are coming from. The City's portion of paying for <br /> the same project total has changed because the County is looking to go for a <br /> different type of grant that they think will have more success in getting. That <br /> different grant is not as big an amount which therefore puts more onto the County <br /> and the two cities to pay. So the City's share changed but it is not suddenly the costs <br /> changed. It is the same dollar amount that is anticipated and projected for the <br /> project. The resolution was not a resolution stating the City would pay for <br /> something, the resolution was saying the City supports applying for the grant. He <br /> indicated the City does periodic traffic counts which are available at the Public <br /> Works Department. He explained the City looks forward to hearing from the public <br /> as this moves forward. <br /> e. Review Changes in Property Tax Base, Legislative Changes and 2024 Council <br /> Budget Goals <br /> Finance Director Michelle Pietrick briefly highlighted this item as detailed in the <br /> Request for Council Action and related attachments dated June 20, 2023. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon reviewed Legislative updates with the City Council. <br /> Mayor Roe noted if the City Council did not change the levy from 2023 to 2024, <br /> theoretically the tax bill for the average median single-family property,even though <br /> the value would go up 4.4 percent, the tax would go down by 1.3 percent. If the <br /> City kept the tax rate the same in 2024, theoretically the levy could increase by <br /> about 6.6 percent,and the resulting City tax bill impact to the median single-family <br /> home would go up by approximately the same percentage as their value went up. <br /> Councilmember Strahan asked about the office percent increase of 42.49 percent, <br /> if it is based on anything in particular, and is that just Roseville or is that the entire <br /> region. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.