My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 07102023
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2023
>
CCP 07102023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2023 4:17:04 PM
Creation date
7/14/2023 4:15:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
7/10/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
266
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
business could just budget this into their costs and pay that fee when it comes up. <br />He asked what that meant, would it mean every incident is $100 penalty. <br />Ms. Culver explained some of the details staff would want to run by the City <br />Attorney but he believed it could be $100 penalty with every violation and that <br />would be, generally how that would work, the City probably would not do <br />compliance checks unless working with the health department because the City <br />does not do any licensing of restaurants, at this level for most of these <br />establishments. This would probably be on a complaint basis. It could be <br />cumulative and in excess of that. <br />Ms. Howey wondered why a nursing home would be exempt. She indicated she <br />works in a nursing home and there are piles of polystyrene and she did not know <br />what the rationale is for that and if it was a finance thing. <br /> <br />Ms. Bakken assumed that it is because those nursing homes and hospitals contract <br />with certain food service companies so there might be a mix of pre-packaged foods <br />they are using and also whatever they are contractually obligated to use for certain <br />dietary restrictions, that would make it a little more burdensome for those locations <br />to try to comply. <br /> <br />Mr. Culver indicated they needed to figure out what is considered take-out. The <br />food is prepared in a kitchen and taken out to the rooms at the nursing homes or <br />hospital rooms so it is still kind of internal. He noted it is still not great to use <br />polystyrene but he thought the intent was to try to keep this from going to people’s <br />homes and then being disposed of there. <br /> <br />Motion <br />Member Collins moved, Member Hodder seconded, to recommend the City <br />Council follow the St. Louis Park Ordinance as a base with 2023 as an <br />education year and 2024 to start enforcement of the Ordinance as well as some <br />type of sliding scale for penalties and banning black plastic as well as tying this <br />to Ramsey County roll out of curbside recycling. <br /> <br />Ayes: 4 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />Ms. Bakken made a presentation on Plastic Bag Ordinance. <br />Mr. Culver indicated this particular item was not driven by the Council. This was <br />not something that the Council suggested talking about. This was something the <br />previous chair of the PWETC, Joe Wozniak, brought up to research. He explained <br />he was not sure if this would be ready to make a recommendation on to the City <br />Council until more research is done. The question he thought was interesting was <br />why Minneapolis exempted food take-out for the plastic bags in particular because <br />Page 5 of 7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.