CC_Minutes_2023_0710 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,July 10,2023 Page 3 On the enforcement of this, she noticed the Commission wanted to talk to the Police Department. She wondered what the feedback was on this if there was discussion with the Police Department. She also asked what the benefits versus the costs would be and when other cities lowered the speeds, did that reduce the speeders or what was the outcome of that. She assumed the one piece has to do with crashes and asked what Roseville's percentage is. Chair Ficek explained this topic came up initially with the Council and part of the reasoning behind it was simply the risk factors. If risks are looked at, in terms of being a pedestrian or bicyclist, there are no sidewalks on the local roads, so if the pedestrian or bicyclist is on the road and gets hit, chances of survival increase with lower speeds. That was part of the reason to start looking at it and seeing if this is something the City should do. In terms of accidents, there are not a tremendous number of them. The City is looking at a risk, also looking at priorities, is the City prioritizing walking or biking and how does that mix into the City's sustainability and climate. Those are all of the factors that can come into it. In terms of talking to the Police, it is a conversation the Commission still has to have. The Police Department did provide some information such as crash data. In terms of what other cities have seen,he is not sure if there has been a definitive view, some streets have gotten better, and some have not. He was still waiting for Minneapolis and St. Paul to provide information. Some studies have said that changing the limit does not matter it is what is the environment being driven through and for the street the City has, these are pretty wide open, if no one is parking on them. Back to the enforcement, because the driver is reacting to the environment, this will turn everyone into speeders. He noted there are still a lot of questions to the questions being asked, which is why he thinks this is still an interesting topic to pursue. Councilmember Etten noted this was a partial piece of information, so he thought before this moves forward, the Council needs to see the kind of information that the PWETC moves forward with on this topic and before going to the public for viewpoints to see if the Council is ready to take that jump. He thought Chair Ficek listed off some pros and cons very well. He understood there are very few vehicle vs. pedestrian accidents in the City. He explained there are many factors into why there are accidents like this, and street speeds are actually a small potential factor. He explained when he looked at Minneapolis and St. Paul lowering their speed limits to 20mph,he has not seen any big change except on streets where there are a lot of cars on one side of the street. Then people already have slowed down to keep safe, so he did not know if that data is going to tell them much. He thought if a City similar to Roseville did a study, then he would think that was a more relevant connection. He would rather see what effects the City is having on current driver behavior before the City changes everything. He explained he was very skeptical in moving forward because of all of those pieces. He also thought by moving forward with this item, it would take away from discussion on some other very important topics.