My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2023_0710
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2023
>
CC_Minutes_2023_0710
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2023 3:49:31 PM
Creation date
7/25/2023 3:49:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/24/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 10, 2023 <br /> Page 8 <br /> based on discussion with the residents. The Commission thought that was a good <br /> idea. <br /> Councilmember Groff knew from neighbors that is an interest to them so the <br /> Commission could reach out to residents and see if there is interest. <br /> Councilmember Schroeder explained she liked the idea of moving beyond just this <br /> one issue to look at a policy on how this should be done. She also liked the idea <br /> that there would be parameters around that as well and have the residents petition <br /> for it. <br /> Councilmember Etten indicated he was okay with it but did not think it would solve <br /> the problem that was stated. He noted a GPS system is not going to care what the <br /> name is; it is just directing the person to where it needs to go. He would be <br /> concerned about how the name would be selected and how that process works. <br /> Mayor Roe gave feedback on the scope, duties, and functions draft from the <br /> PWETC. <br /> b. Consider a Resolution Providing Preliminary Approval of a Major Plat of an <br /> Existing Parcel as Ten Lots for Single-Family Attached Homes (Twinhomes) <br /> Senior Planner Brian Lloyd briefly highlighted this item as detailed in the Request <br /> for Council Action and related attachments dated July 10, 2023. <br /> Councilmember Groff asked if staff has looked at the parking in the area. He knew <br /> the parking got bottled up when there were events in the park and that residents <br /> were upset with that issue. <br /> Mr. Lloyd explained there really is not a whole lot to say, the proposal does <br /> accommodate all of the required parking in the Zoning Code within the site. He <br /> explained the parking shortage in the park is not the responsibility of the developer <br /> to remedy. The developer is doing what it can to accommodate all of the parking <br /> on site. <br /> Public Comment <br /> Mayor Roe offered an opportunity for public comment. <br /> Mr.John Kysylyczyn,3083 Victoria Street <br /> Mr. Kysylyczyn indicated the only question he has is where the fence is between <br /> the private property and Rosebrook Park. He wondered if there is a fence already <br /> there. He asked what is separating the private property from the public property. <br /> He noted there is a swimming pool as well as a drainage pond on the upper right- <br /> hand side of the property and he presumed there is a fencing requirement depending <br /> on the size of the ponding. He indicated that is not the main point, there is kind of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.