My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2023_0821
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2023
>
CC_Minutes_2023_0821
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2023 1:25:03 PM
Creation date
9/25/2023 1:25:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/21/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,August 21, 2023 <br /> Page 7 <br /> would be unable to protect. She thought there were certain life and safety <br /> requirements that,regardless of what the State Law says,the City would be able to <br /> enforce just as a matter of common sense. <br /> Mayor Roe explained one thing in the State Law is that, at the very end of the law, <br /> it states"Micro units must comply with municipal setback requirements established <br /> by Ordinance for manufactured homes. If a municipality does not have such an <br /> Ordinance, micro units must be set back on all sides by at least ten feet." He did <br /> have some questions about exactly how that is interpreted but pointed out the <br /> section of the City Code that was provided to the Council as a bench handout related <br /> to setbacks for manufactured homes. There are front yard setbacks, side yard <br /> setbacks, setbacks from streets,and exterior boundaries. There is also one category <br /> in the City Code that is called"Distance Between Mobile Homes Twenty Feet"but <br /> given that it is not called a setback, he was unsure if it can be enforced as one, <br /> although in the State Law it talks about ten feet on all sides. He did not know if <br /> that meant ten feet on all sides of each unit or ten feet on all sides of the cluster of <br /> units. He would be curious about this. <br /> Councilmember Strahan indicated when she read this, she was concerned that some <br /> church facilities might be able to put housing on front yards. She wondered if there <br /> was anything that would prevent that if there was ten feet around the home. <br /> Ms.Gundlach explained her thought was if Councilmember Strahan was concerned <br /> about a front yard setback, the setback standards for their manufactured home park <br /> is what would apply, and staff provided those as a bench handout. <br /> Mayor Roe did not think the City had a lot of options, but a conditional use does <br /> not make sense if other conditions cannot be applied to it. <br /> Councilmember Etten indicated he was not ready to make a motion yet,but agreed <br /> with Mayor Roe that part of what the City should be looking for is to have <br /> manufactured home park setbacks and rules come back to make sure the City's <br /> language is clear to reduce confusion in the future. <br /> Councilmember Strahan indicated this is on units under 400 square feet. She <br /> wondered if there was a next category on what constitutes a cottage home and does <br /> the City have the ability to make any changes or address that or is that something <br /> the City should consider in the future. <br /> Ms. Gundlach explained somebody wanting to take advantage of this legislation <br /> has to meet these requirements full stop and if someone wants to build a 401 square <br /> foot unit, it is considered a courtyard cottage under the City's Zoning Code and <br /> would have to meet all of the zoning requirements, the building code, connect to <br /> sewer and water, etc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.