Laserfiche WebLink
165 Member Cicha indicated the information states "more than fifty percent of owners <br />166 on the street," would that mean fifty percent of parcels on the street or property <br />167 owners. <br />168 <br />169 Mr. Freihammer indicated it would be per parcel, one vote per parcel. <br />170 <br />171 Chair Ficek asked if there should be a spot, replacing A, where the individuals <br />172 would need to come to the City to talk about it first. He could see someone seeing <br />173 this information, getting a bunch of signatures before coming to the City and then <br />174 having the City tell them it will not work. He wondered if having them check in at <br />175 the very front would be better to either tell the person there is no chance or to <br />176 provide that guidance. A slight reordering of the information. <br />177 <br />178 Ms. Lowry indicated she was not sure where that would go because this is reviewed <br />179 by the City Engineer first and then the City Engineer would take it to other agencies. <br />180 <br />181 Chair Ficek asked if the petition would include signatures. <br />182 <br />183 Ms. Lowry thought the last sentence under Item A could be moved up higher in <br />184 paragraph, "Applicants are encouraged to contact the City Engineer to discuss the <br />185 process prior to circulating a petition." <br />186 <br />187 Chair Ficek thought instead of "encouraged" it should read "Applicants need to <br />188 contact the City Engineer..." <br />189 <br />190 Mr. Freihammer indicated staff could do that. <br />191 <br />192 Motion <br />193 Member Mueller moved, Member Hodder seconded, to recommend staff to <br />194 move forward to the City Council with changes as proposed and adding a <br />195 process A to contact the City Engineer as the first step for the Street Naming <br />196 Policy. <br />197 <br />198 Ayes:5 <br />199 Nays:0 <br />200 Motion carried. <br />201 <br />202 8. Discuss Commission Scope <br />203 Public Works Director Jesse Freihammer reviewed previous meeting discussion <br />204 with the Commission. He noted there are some additional bullet points the <br />205 Commission should discuss such as the number of meetings per year, number of <br />206 Commissioners, etc. <br />207 <br />208 The Commission reviewed the proposed changes to the Scope, Duties and <br />209 Functions. There were no additional changes. <br />210 <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />Page 10 of 89 <br />