My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2023_0925
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2023
>
CC_Minutes_2023_0925
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2023 1:51:39 PM
Creation date
10/10/2023 1:51:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/25/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 25, 2023 <br /> Page 3 <br /> brought up and others concurred at some level,that the City might consider making <br /> this a two-step process. The first step process could be to determine if fifty percent <br /> or greater of the residents in the neighborhood agree to change the name and then <br /> there could be a separate clear process for changing the name. He explained this <br /> does provide some direction for what part of the naming convention can be. He felt <br /> similar to what the City did recently with the park renaming is as a community asset <br /> so it should be thoughtful in how the street name is created or changed. That may <br /> be too much,but he did appreciate the changes to the first page on the public notice <br /> specifying who would get the notification about the name change. <br /> Mayor Roe remembered that the Council discussed this as being a two-step process, <br /> but it did not appear that way in the minutes, so he was not one hundred percent <br /> sure where the Council stood. He thought this was a great time to have further <br /> discussion about that. <br /> Councilmember Groff wondered what the two-step process would be. <br /> Mayor Roe indicated it would start out with a petition from the neighborhood <br /> wanting to change the name and the second step would be the input process to <br /> develop what the changed name would be. <br /> Councilmember Etten indicated that was correct. He reviewed what the petition <br /> form would look like with possible changes to it. He thought the people who would <br /> be affected by a street name change, the people who lived on the street, should be <br /> the primary people on the petition. <br /> Mayor Roe thought there would be a process as laid out in the information in the <br /> packet. <br /> Councilmember Strahan requested elaboration on what Process A would mean. <br /> Public Works Director Jesse Freihammer explained in the beginning that was just <br /> a suggestion, but the PWET Commission did recommend that it be made a <br /> requirement. Their thought was to get the emphasis to the next details, A-F. Staff <br /> did not think that most roads in Roseville would qualify based on the County's grid <br /> system. The only opportunities,he thought,would be former County roads that are <br /> still called county roads but most of the system is on a grid and could not be <br /> changed. <br /> Councilmember Strahan indicated with that in mind, she wondered if it would be <br /> possible to add that into part A in the process. Maybe it could be a flow chart that <br /> would show the qualification steps. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.