My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2023_1204
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2023
>
CC_Minutes_2023_1204
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2024 12:47:47 PM
Creation date
1/9/2024 12:47:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/4/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,December 4, 2023 <br /> Page 7 <br /> Mayor Roe added that the cost of this planning effort is well spent and efficiently <br /> used funding. He also appreciated the excellent planning about engagement and <br /> keeping volunteers central to this effort, especially because the volunteers are so <br /> passionate about the issue and the natural resources in their community. He also <br /> thought this plan would help the City put dollars each year towards the capital <br /> improvement spreadsheet to estimate costs. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Strahan, Etten, Schroeder, Groff, and Roe. <br /> Nays: None <br /> f. Discussion Regarding Ordinance Amendments Pertaining to Short Term <br /> Rental Licensing <br /> Community Development Director Janice Gundlach briefly highlighted this item <br /> as detailed in the Request for Council Action and related attachments dated <br /> December 4, 2023. <br /> Building Official David Englund was also at the meeting to answer questions. <br /> Mayor Roe noted the three-hundred-foot and five-hundred-foot distances shown in <br /> the packet are arbitrarily chosen and this is not a staff recommendation. It was used <br /> for illustrative purposes. He also asked for a map of all the registered single-family <br /> rentals that are not short-term rentals but it was not given as a bench handout. Ms. <br /> Gundlach put a copy of that requested map on the screen for councilmembers and <br /> the public. <br /> Councilmember Strahan asked City Attorney Tierney if an owner of an Airbnb or <br /> any of the other rentals are subject to the Minnesota Kari Koskinen background <br /> check since they have access to the dwelling of someone else. Councilmember <br /> Strahan noted that generally with a short-term rental, the owner has to go through <br /> a background check and a multi-family the property manager is supposed to <br /> undergo a background check through the BCA and it is rather exhaustive. <br /> City Attorney Tierney explained she had the opportunity to look up the Kari <br /> Koskinen background check not that long ago and that applies to longer-term <br /> rentals for thirty days or more and she believed it was for multi-family. She knows <br /> the Kari Koskinen law exempts a regular hotel and believed it would exempt these <br /> short term rentals as well. <br /> Councilmember Schroeder explained she has had a couple different versions of the <br /> definition of the seven-day and ten-day consecutive rental and one example was if <br /> there was a rental for two days and left vacant for the rest of the period, that was <br /> the same as renting it for the whole ten days. Or,does it mean that a person actually <br /> has to rent the place for the entire ten-day period. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.