My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023-11-28_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
202x
>
2023
>
2023-11-28_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2024 10:42:34 AM
Creation date
1/25/2024 10:42:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/28/2023
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vice Chair Mueller indicated she was looking at the costs and units of the 2024 <br />RFP and she was trying to remember what the fees are for residents and how much <br />it increased as well as what is expected this next round potentially. She was trying <br />to anticipate how this rolls out to residents. <br />Environmental Manager Johnson explained the rate right now is $14.05 a quarter <br />for the recycling fee on the utility bill. That fee has all of the curbside recycling in <br />it and obviously the parks is part of it, but it also includes cleanup day, shredding <br />day, and staff. It covers everything and obviously the big driver in this case is the <br />collection cost. Staff has already been talking about the next round and he did not <br />think there is a big increase. <br />Vice Chair Mueller asked how a multi -unit fee schedule compares to a single- <br />family household. <br />Environmental Manager Johnson explained every apartment in a multi -family unit <br />is $14.05. <br />Public Works Director Freihammer noted the proposed 2024 cost is $14.50 a unit <br />which is about a 3.2 percent increase. This is mainly increased costs due to the <br />contract and general overall staff costs. There are not any major overall changes. <br />Chair Ficek thanked Environmental Manager Johnson for the presentation. He <br />thought there was a lot of good information in there and looked forward to more <br />information in the first quarter of 2024. <br />6. City Campus Solar Update <br />Environmental Manager Ryan Johnson updated the Commission on the City <br />Campus Solar plan. <br />Chair Ficek thought this plan was a success. <br />Member Hodder asked when staff was doing the feasibility analysis for the solar <br />was the City seeing what the consultant showed for a savings. <br />Environmental Manager Johnson explained the City is close. The City is producing <br />close to what the consultant said the City would produce but are a little bit under <br />versus what was shown. <br />Member Fergus asked if Roseville's goal is to have one hundred percent energy <br />produced onsite. He indicated he was confused by the two graphs that are shown in <br />the packet. <br />Environmental Manager Johnson explained the graph on the left is City operations <br />to be one percent renewable and the graph on the right is twenty-five percent of <br />City operations would be produced onsite. Twenty-five percent of all of the energy <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.