Laserfiche WebLink
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING <br /> OF THE <br /> CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, <br /> County of Ramsey, Minnesota was duly held on the 29th day of January, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. <br /> The following members were present: Etten, Groff, Strahan, and Roe; <br /> and the following were absent: Schroeder <br /> Member Etten introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION No. 12051 <br /> RESOLUTION SUPPORTING RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT STATE BONDING <br /> REQUEST FOR JONES LAKE <br /> WHEREAS,in 2013,the City of New Brighton and the City of St.Anthony Village petitioned the Rice <br /> Creek Watershed District to address stormwater management and flooding within our cities; and <br /> WHEREAS,Roseville petitioned the Rice Creek Watershed District in 2014 to be a co-petitioner with <br /> New Brighton and St. Anthony Village; and <br /> WHEREAS,the Rice Creek Watershed District amended the 2013 petition and approved the inclusion <br /> of the City of Roseville in June 2014; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Rice Creek Watershed District has implemented project improvements in Hansen <br /> Park and Mirror Lake to meet primary project objectives that were completed in 2018; and <br /> WHEREAS, New Brighton has acquired property in and around Jones Lake to facilitate a large <br /> stormwater project that mitigates flooding risk in the petition communities; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Jones Lake Project is estimated to be $7 million for design and construction, and the <br /> project would not be possible without the assistance of State bonding given the scope and cost of the <br /> entire project. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville,that the City <br /> supports the Rice Creek Watershed District's request for State bonding in the amount of$7,000,000 <br /> for the design and construction of the Jones Lake Project. <br /> The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Groff, and <br /> upon a vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: Etten, Groff, Strahan, and Roe; <br /> and the following voted against the same: None. <br /> WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />