Laserfiche WebLink
u <br />n <br />� <br />SECTION 5 <br />LIST OF HOMES REQUIRING COMMENTS <br />ROBERT A: JONE: <br />CONSULTINfi ENGiNBE <br />I.A GRANGE, ILLINOtB <br />1. W.D. Coo er ' <br />P Owner claimed interference on Cha. 4, Our <br />�421 Talisman test set played perfectly on this channel, <br />Roseville, Minn. as did his set in the basement. Owner then <br />conceded the trouble was in his own receiver. � <br />2• H•B• Nygren Owner claimed that he had trouble on Cha. ll. ' <br />2656 Hamlin Ave. However our test set la ed <br />Roseville, Minn. then stated it was some timePagoeeand�that.'..he :� <br />did not have any trouble lately. We found <br />nothing wrong. <br />3. S. Atwood Owner claimed oles <br />#123 Trailer Park ion. He has aPnew color�setewithtindoecept <br />Roseville, Min.n, antenna inside a metal house trailer. Owner <br />claims salesman told him he did not need out=:`�;,, <br />door antenna. His reception had not changed <br />and he appears to be trying to ,et an outdoor„;:� <br />antenna for free. I would not give this party' <br />an antenna. <br />4. K. Carlson Reception was bad on all channels. Invest- <br />#124 Trailer Park igation proved that owners small son had <br />Roseville, Minn, pulled lead-in wire off rear of TV set. This <br />5. A, Klucsar <br />2599 Lexington Ave. <br />Roseville, Minn. <br />6. W. Rehpahl <br />3004 Little Bay <br />Roseville, Minn. <br />corrected ownersca�tplaints. <br />Owner claimed reception was much worse. Our <br />�test set showed� ghosts both before and after. <br />I do not find any significant change in this � <br />owners reception. He lives behind the trail- <br />er park, which accounts for his poor recept- <br />ion. <br />Owner claimed snowy picture on all channels <br />Rd, (color set) was due to our NSP poles. Our <br />test set played perfectly. I informed owner <br />trouble was in his set, and to call service- <br />man. It is obviously a bad tube. Black and <br />white set in home played the same as before. <br />