Laserfiche WebLink
I� <br />t } � � <br />,r� t! 1 9 { J.,�,'YjF ^Y lf".' i1'6 �Ty''� . <br />_ � 1. t� � �'It�y �� 4�.,l.'K;'"y�y ...` <br /># q <br />� f4�� � 4't,F �, <br />� ,� � >>£ z�a{�"x �`� � <br />. � . . . � ` � ty i�r i �a a <br />r ,_' '.� ��.: . ' � .. . � ' ': `" � � tl� �1¢t <br />t <br />t <br />z 5n5t <br />, � � n� ? � <br />�' t��r <br />�� c� <br />� , ,�,� � <br />U r , ���� <br />May 5, 1971 � 7 <br />� . . . � � � . � � . � � 7 � t�;�ri� <br />� Y <br />', . � . � ' . _ . . � '. . ., .' . 5 ., �� ` <br />; . . . .. � . . '� .. ., _ . ,. � .} JI <br />CAS E� NUMBER. 623-71 ti� <br />: " ; : �> <br />A ky� <br />� � ��� <br />f <br />' . . . _ . . . .. �', ' r x� t�; <br />; " APPLiCANT: � <br />Dayton Development C��rporation �. � `T�.,' <br />, l ` l w <br />� � . ' .. " � � h1 . I�. <br />{ �� �� <br />LOCATION: Rosed�ale Shoppeng �ent�er . ,M1`��: <br />�r, ; <br />� � � � � � 4� <br />` � ACTiON "REQUE5TED: Amendment to Special tJse P�rmit and Varian�e `- `' '' �� <br />: , �< <br />' ; <br />PLANI�JiNG CONSIDER,4TIUNS: .�. <br />.. . . . . . � . . . . . . . . : . : . . . 4.. <br />� . . . . . . �. . �f � r t'� <br />1. ; �; <br />The applicant is proposing to develop a garden shop in the south+N�st porfic�n , �, h4 <br />of ti�e �Rosedale�Shopp�ng Center, The site plai� endicates #hat developm�rit � <br />of a single "principal building" with an outcioarsat�s area and an ad,jacenfi <br />drivewa area. The sii�� ' f}. <br />Y plan indicates a sefiback of' 80 feet from the` t,s <br />� pr op e r ty. f i n e, an d t here fore, a variance m�st be granted frum the�minimum ' <br />i00 foofi serback requiremento ` <br />;� <br />� .' <br />: 2. The �arden center development� will preemp� approximately IOt� parking , 'n <br />spaces �From the existing parking arrangemen; , The applicant has`indicated � �' <br />1' �5 r: <br />that additiona! parking spaces are ta be provided elsewher� or� the Rosedai� ` <br />Center property, Howev�r, ifi is not certain as to when these additiona! ` .' <br />parking spaces are to be rovided. The exi t° L` <br />�'�.; P s in <br />s� g parking sc�heme for the <br />aoserfa(e Center was grqnted on a variance from the Vi l�age Ordinance <br />accordii�g fio a formula developed by the Dayton Development Carparati�n. <br />lt is questionable whether a��ariance shou(d be granted from �his� formula. <br />3. The site pfan do�s not give an indicatian as to proposed advertising signs. <br />It is recommendec! fihat an advertising sign plan be submitfied for appraval by <br />the Plcsnning Cnmm�issie�a � <br />x: <br />4e t�enerally speaking, the development of a garden c�nter wifihin` fihe Rosedat� <br />Center is an acceptc�ble use of land> Qne of the important cansidemteor�s <br />in this matter is th� develapmeint of additional uses ar�d buildings eNithin the <br />Rosedale Center complex. No specific overal) indication has been given fio <br />fihe Village as to the uli�imate number or locations of such "accessory us�s". <br />It is our o;�inion that if same brc>ad concept of overu6l design of the Rosedale <br />Cnmplex are not broug��t forth in th� near future, the Village ma� be faced <br />weth pot�ntial development problem�. Without a generalixed cc�ncept plan, <br />the area may become an int�nsivelv used "sea of asphs�lt" with clusters <br />� <br />of build�ngs resulting is c�isjointed traf�ic circulation patternso A similar <br />� <br />rt, <br />��,; . <br />. ,. :;' <br />