|
,���K. . . _ :
<br />�4�z '.�-'. .
<br />e� '
<br />i_ .
<br />4
<br />���- :
<br />.....i,='n�: � . .
<br />F':
<br />f..
<br />�.� . . . . � . �
<br />M1
<br />�
<br />LEw�s L.ANOER3APt
<br />ATTORNEY AT LAW
<br />W-2�S3 TIR9T NATIONAL BANK BUfLU1N(3
<br />ST.PAUL,MININE30T/► �SS101
<br />Aprii 6, 1a65
<br />�
<br />a'f -`. . - � .
<br />� Mr. James P. M��son
<br />�l ;
<br />� i At'torney at La�►
<br />,�;., - 81 I P�on�er Bui Iding
<br />y,: - Sain�t `P�uI, Minn. �51�I
<br />�;
<br />�,
<br />_.
<br />�` ,' I n re: Thomas M.�1i I t mus �
<br />Mv file 952-G
<br />��.,
<br />- D�er: Mr. Ne I : .. _
<br />�;�t
<br />You, { ur►derstand, are C�ai rman of the Vt I I age of ���
<br />,��r
<br />.N; Rosevil l e P l a � n i n g C o m m i s s � o n a n d y o u w i l l h a v e b e fo re y�u' ''
<br />t,., for cansideration, at a meeting of the Commission to b�
<br />�, � ' he I,d �Ilednesday, Apr i I 7�th, the quest i on �f whether the Com-
<br />� ` �' m i ss i on shou I d recommend to the Vi I I age Counai I a furti�er �
<br />'� ;�� ' :� mod i.f i cat i on of ttae' Zon i ng Ord i nance of �he V i I 1 age i n i.ts � �'�
<br />�'{",+ ; ` app l i cat i on to the property owned by Thomas M. '�i I I mus {s
<br />� 4`` ' 1 ocated i n Sect i on 9 Tawnsh i 2�, Ran e 23, fac t ng �ester i y.
<br />> . . _ I P ' ! 9 �14
<br />�� , on G� eve l an d }# v e n u e a n d t o � h e N+ o r t h o f t h e p r o p e r t y 'so! d to �;�
<br />�_ � Roger O��Pitsenbarger.
<br />�J� � F . . . ' . . . � Y��
<br />'Y,�t'� W y. _ .�.. . ' . . . . . � � 5irsit
<br />��k �� .'. ' ;� , � � . . . �. .
<br />��� � , • . � • � . � y
<br />a,�,�;4 x � Lt � s'our ��nderstand o�ng ,that the . Comm i ss i on propfls es. ��
<br />����` � to, impose greater and. more str i n�ent restr � ct! ons uporr the a��;
<br />�� use _ of. ,triat property than those p�cqposed on " � 4
<br />�,;ak� propert [ es zonec!
<br />m� r -�=ane;. :that' the met hod , o f i m p o s i n g t h e s e r e s t r i c t: i o n s i s r r o t s ��>�
<br />`` ;by a re-zoning but by the adoption of an amendment �o the �-k`
<br />�
<br />t��� ,� ` �Zon i ng "'Ord i'nance cneat i ng a subc ( ass i f'i ca� i on restr� i ct i n to I' ,�'Y
<br />}�°" a inarked degree the uses now �
<br />permitted, this in sp:i:te of the - Fs
<br />'4�s 'fact that .the property to the Norih �nd �o the South and ���
<br />( �4
<br />'..,Y�cross th� pub i. � c h i ghway 'to the '�►est" has ' been cleve 1 oped, ancl, r'-
<br />� ; t;
<br />�� �s pr�sently being used for punposes permitted in Class (-One..;.
<br />, _ ��.;
<br />F s; � f t i s the �;
<br />, posttion of Thomas M� Willmu� that �he ;:
<br />�. � ''pr►oposa l to be con5 i dered i s un j ust i f i ed and,. i f adopted,
<br />+ t '`�wi l I re�ult in the tak.in of his '4°i
<br />9 property w'tthout_due process t`4,
<br />�i;; `, of ! aw;` that the restr i ct � ons i mpos�d to be app l i ed are un- -�
<br />�,f � reasonabl e arod without merit. It i s my understandi ng :that � s;
<br />` �fi� w'�'� I I mus w i l:-) appear bef=or.e your Comm��.z�� and ask' to be 4:
<br />J ( )F*
<br />i ��
<br />,y ,<hear,d.and �iil in his awn fanyuage state the reasons why he
<br />, - � fe.e f s, the proposa l c�rnnot meet the test of court dec [ s i ons ' �;-:$
<br />� � � and ,that such restr i ct i;ons, 'r, f i mposed, w i l l, i n fact, take _ `
<br />4/
<br />h�s.property in.violatton of the Constitution and, I believe,
<br />' w� 1 I assure the. Comm���� that i f such act i on i s taken that "/�`
<br />a r"ev e ew �r i.1 I be soi�ght � i n the courts . �� ;
<br />��
<br />�: . ,: You;ps very tru{ y� : ,' ;;
<br />C.. � ' . . . ' � . � - .
<br />. . 1 . � � ,. y;
<br />s` y S
<br />i��,y
<br />� r " "' . . . . � � \✓ W"� � "
<br />r� ��� d J.��� \.f:Q: _ :- .. � ���
<br />� ,a'� ,.,1':f:?''� . �� 3 ` f �4 Z '�-+� _ r ? 7t
<br />� : . .
<br />, _ �.. ..� _'�__.' �.
<br />.. ., . ....-. .. ., ..:�., , ; , �':� ,�. . . . .' . �-�. -�.' ��._"��. ,. , . �. ..�. .. . , . ... �N:
<br />_ _ _ . .. . . . . . . . _ . _ . . . .... .. §.
<br />
|