Laserfiche WebLink
. <br />� <br />�'l�in� File 611-71 - Petitian far Renamin`�o <br />g f Fnrest Lake C�.�toff to Old Highivay 8 <br />Discussion <br />rtro Iiarold fiaglund, 2923 Forest Lake Cutoff, spoke in favor o <br />OId Hi�ivay 8, He indicated that there are cvrrently three df �ang�g th� n� to <br />stmet in three different co ifferent names for the same <br />types of c�eliver• �►itieso I3ec.ause of this there is general confu�ion fo <br />ies anci for people who are atrempting to loc��te a particular addreS r all <br />��rman I�Tembrez stated s° <br />indicate that they desire the�se p�tition signed by the reside:nts cm F <br />see no reason for not making �-.}l� �an�� ��d to 01d I-Ii y,a g °rest Lake Cutoff <br />� Y and, therefox•e, he could <br />Recommendati� <br />Mrs, Demos Mov+eci and T�., Kellett Seconded th�t t <br />renaming �f Forest Lake G�.itoff to OId Highway 8, hRoll Cassion recorre�nd a <br />Kellett and MembreZ, Nays ; N�e e PProval for <br />11, A,yes. Pope, Eagles8 Demoso <br />P1at�nl.ng File 612�71 - Ri�a�d No <br />rman request for variance to :rear yard setback at 981 <br />Lydia Avenue <br />Presentation <br />Mra Normari stated that llis wife is an invaiid <br />for therapy p�-poses o and is requi red 1:o sWim tha�e times a da <br />She is unable to go to public pools or beaches, ��e y <br />Was proposing to build an attached m�e story enclosed swl <br />hous.e to provic�e this needed rehabilitation, stated tha.t he <br />setback and the enclosure would exten T�� village ode requirestae30 �r °f }iis <br />necess1ta�Ging an lg foot variance, d to �thin 12 feet of the rear x ert foot rear yard <br />P °P Y Ii.ne thereby <br />Discussion <br />--.�a..v. <br />I�4ro Abbot Rohn� 956 1.,, Avenue <br />his o p pos i t i o n t o t h e� �. r i a ncea � T he �zn� o� Pos i t i o r p a p e r t o t h e Commission outl' ' <br />P t s o f h i s c, p p o s i t ian are as follows: �� g <br />1Q The z�ing code has stooci the test of time m <br />ailoiv this variance to be�o� th� first of its�kindrS� �lease do not <br />2 o Value of surrot,uidin <br />g property is never enhanced by a residential varianceo <br />3a A 50 foot long extensirni is out of plac� and out of chara <br />of this neighborhood, cter in the confines <br />4� �e pool area would merely be another noise center to ol <br />5° The Pool will create traffic tlirou m P�ute our environment, <br />necessary $500 for a defensive fenc�e, Y�'remises forcing rne to spend an �m <br />T�'o 1�1ark and r1r, Rooney from the LF;GqL Aid Societ <br />University of A4innesota s ' Y and third year law stud�nts at the <br />upported hlro Ro}�n S point of viewo <br />rlxe Jahn Sauer, 983 Lydia Avent.be, indicated that th,e ��`or�ans <br />the neia s�ti�imming pool lJOU1C� certainly not clepreciate the valu�re fine neighbors and that <br />e of the property ln the ar�ao <br />