My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01990
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1900-1999
>
pf_01990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2024 3:49:15 PM
Creation date
2/15/2024 3:49:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1563
Planning Files - Type
Variance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ashland Oil Company, Case No. 1990 <br />Page 2 <br />the contiguous land owner, Mr. Mast. Ashland Oil has indicated to Mr. <br />Jopke that the various agreements are being conveyed to Mr. Mast and <br />his attorney this week, with the apparent intent to accomplish this <br />agreement prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Therefore, it <br />would appear that the extended negotiations and revisions to the site <br />plan may be agreed upon prior to the Planning Commission hearing (or <br />perhaps not). <br />In addition, the current site plan proposes the closing of one of the <br />three existing driveways to the site off of Lexington Avenue. Staff has <br />encouraged this step and has suggested that it will improve the <br />functioning of the site and improv, safety conditions on Lexington <br />Avenue. <br />Back in 19849 Staff recommended and the Planning Commission <br />concurred that the required 16-1/2 feett of dedication on Lexington <br />Avenue should be accomplished as a part of the variance request at <br />that time. It was recommended that the actual right-of-way to be <br />dedicated would be rm)uced to 16 feet since that was the distance to <br />the existing curb. The Council approved the variance in 1984, but did <br />not require the right-of-way dedication. At this tirne, since there is <br />now an adjustment in props-`.y lines (a land division), the right -of -waxy <br />dedication in again triggered. Therefore, we suggest that the Planning <br />Commission sand Council consider any o tion on this site to include a <br />condition that tine It, feet of right-of-way be dedicated. <br />Landscaping <br />A revised landactapea (elan has boon prepared, which appears adoquoto it <br />the existing Dodge Is loft intact. You will notice that there is an <br />intent to build rf now fore a contiguous to this teedge, no Oown In the <br />revised .site plan. Soule additional landscaping could be gadded where the <br />driveway is to be +Moved tat tx,u coutteeast corrWr of the site. <br />Trrasla 1=laaredli <br />There is <br />ales o%otitn, <manpotor indliefatttl <br />oil ttto <br />site !heel in tout <br />feaar[hwvx u <br />curo a° taf tftr si"$C . A cottdiOott <br />rod«arita�� <br />Qtatig ttsis duptepater <br />bty totaally <br />acre=osutd toted/or iwtt clted to tint <br />atrocturo <br />as <br />Engirettsro f °seftoidor tatiolo <br />AtcaaettocJ iti cop, of tout l farwtritsl �btPtttb ttt' rirrt iattle�ttRtta <br />their ctalic"rros. 'feet tr oat or*rlows of ttwoo entwe'rtta 6-5 OW aiAl"'w'.can of <br />dedicotiotr of rttlltt=r�f.w�tFiy. WO colwor th of thso right-af„w;. y co"W �41 <br />roduc'esd to 16 fret iat� or'igit-villy at,99ostt(i its Ja)94 4rF Wp r laleat,-rs tosatl <br />f�nt�ifw€rers. <br />L f-'Ot`iCLUSIMJ <br />Subject to the aaffoete d land uw ouro' mutual otrte�rtteret. it wratalcP kaplafrAaF <br />that the de velcapmen" proposal %vili oulve as Iaow owrotrro'aip dlapt:to areal <br />ficctira1rta0tlt.at#3 as vuritanc.: % tho west side them will .allow for the t7gress <br />of vehicles from the oxit dozers on the west ,aide of th0. structua°sa. lP`sau <br />tYill eueat'l, tlitt tluil dr tjinati purpoue of 010. appiicaatiurt will to ineponfin <br />thaw turning radii for thuse Vuhiclos. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.