My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01571
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1500-1599
>
pf_01571
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2024 11:24:23 AM
Creation date
2/15/2024 4:27:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1571
Planning Files - Type
Variance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1• <br />PLANNING REPORT 0 <br />DATE: <br />CASE NUMBER: 6 February 1985 <br />1571-85 <br />APPLICANT: <br />LOCATION: Willmus Companies <br />Southwest corner of Hamline Avenue and <br />Centennial Drive <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br />Variance to Sign Setback <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br />1• As you know, the Hamline Office Building was completed this last year, and <br />was a subject of a variance request relating to its front yard setback <br />P <br />frontage on Hamline Avenue. An additional ten feet of right -of - <br />dedicated by the applicant on Hamline Avenue and the bui way was <br />mistakenly placed 30 feet from the old right-of-wayline, lding was <br />Placing it within 20 feet of the new right-of-wayline. e, therefore <br />approved, along with an allowance for placing he sidewalk approximately <br />was <br />proxi a <br />five feet within the right-of-way. PP mately <br />2. The Willmus Companies are now asking for a variance for <br />low ground sign to be within ten feet of the new right-of-way placement of a <br />sign located is illustrated on a site plan submitted b <br />attached to this report. line. This <br />y the applicant and <br />3• The property is zoned Sho <br />foot pping Center District which allows a 100 square <br />pylon sign within 30 feet of the <br />Public right-of-way. Obviously, <br />With the building already placed 20 feet from the right-of-way, <br />relatively impractical. The Shopping Center District also <br />a110W8 for the placement of u <br />area for sho P to three pylon signs 200 square feet in <br />pping center purposes. The office building is obviously not a <br />shopping center, but the site as a whole could have far m <br />is proposed, <br />ore aignage than <br />The sign proposed will be 30 square feet in area to be <br />from the property line and will be 4. from ten feet <br />south edge of the sign and approximately feet high off the ground at the <br />ly three feet off the ground (to the <br />top) at the north edge. Being only30 <br />Aasauming a 100 square foot Percent of the allowable aignage <br />feet allowed, the sign will belrelatively and lincons f cut high versus the 25 <br />sign as proposed is intended not to obliterate the east•el vatic sl <br />buildin y, the <br />g, which we believe most would construe to be a relative °handsome <br />structure. <br />handsome <br />4• The City in the past has fre �.�. <br />closer to quent. allowed such low ground signs to be <br />the right-of-way than a taller <br />the <br />Ordinance. The sign as proposed could be Pylon sign allowed b <br />it be constructed to be in lieu of the 100+;Pproved with the condition that <br />sign allowed. This condition would square foot, 25 foot high pylon <br />applying for a second pylon sign on the proPrevent some future owner from <br />corner lot, could in fact have such a second Pertysign.pl placed on the noThe ppertrthe a <br />frontage. <br />rly <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.