pf_01728 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

• PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 4 March 1987 1728 James H. and Catherine Casey North of Victoria, Across from Roselawn Cemetery (see sketch) Approval of Preliminary Plat and Special Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development 1. The Caseys have lived in the City of Roseville for many years and occupy a r -me located on one of three large parcels of land that they own in thi ';ty. These three parcels, as they exist, are indicated on the attack, opy of the section map. The property occupied ' by the house also includes an old fashioned two story garage (stable) which has a carriage house on the second floor. In other words, there is a rental apartment on the second floor of the existing garage. The Caseys inform us that this garage has been occu ed as a living unit since the days 'prior to the adoption of the ordinance and it appears to be a legal nonconforming use. 2. The property is currently served by a private driveway which is shared by the owners of the property to the east. This private driveway access and a turnaround that exists near the center of the property is indicated on the proposed plat as Outlot A. Lot 3 of the proposed subdivision is best developable as part of the Zittel property to the west (at such time that this property is developed). A sewer line has been constructed along the south side of the Zittel property through Lot 3 and into 'the remainder of the Casey property so as to provide public sewer for all of the lots proposed. At this time, an easement is proposed as per the City's suggestion as temporary access to Lot 3. Lot 3 will be further subdivided at such time that a plat is approved providing street access through the Zittel property to the west. The staff has reviewed this in considerable length with Mr. and Mrs. Casey and agree that this will be the most appropriate solution for that property. In that case, it may well be more appropriate to label Lot 3 as an Outlot, thus designating it as not being developable with this development proposal. 3. The staff has reviewed various optional development designs with the Caseys. Though the development of a public street and a 120 foot cul-de-sac would appear to be a standard solution. In this case, due to the wooded and steep terrain, it would appear that such a cul-de-sac would in fact destroy much of the quality of the land for development purposes. Thus, the Caseys are proposing a planned unit development