My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01776
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1700-1799
>
pf_01776
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2024 1:20:21 PM
Creation date
2/16/2024 9:33:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1776
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
417
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Department Approval: <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Manager Reviewed: <br />DATE: 9/14/87 <br />ITEM NO.:—J <br />Agenda Section: <br />Reports and recommendations <br />Item Description: Request for noise ordinance variance for Centre Pointe <br />construction project <br />Imperial Developers which is the grading, excavating, and utility contractor <br />for Woodbridge Properties has written <br />letter <br />regulationacity <br />allowefornextended <br />that a <br />variance be granted to our noise ordinance <br />hours of work on the Centre Pointe development project. The contractor is <br />requesting a variance that would allow him to start work at 7:30 a.m. on <br />Saturdays. During this morning period,he <br />wsllrastor would exoavatin8estormaponds and <br />utility pipes throughout the development <br />performing grading work. <br />The ordinance sets the hours of 7:00 a.m. <br />to 10:00 p.m. on weekdays and 9:00 <br />a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on weekends. A copy of the ordinance as well as the letter <br />is attached. It would appear that this request <br />i reasonable due to the <br />location of the project and its proximity to <br />As you may recall, a similar request wase reconstructicnde in March f1987 projeoty tThe main <br />contractor performing the Snelling <br />venu <br />difference between thee® two requests iaprior tarequest <br />aotualeoounoilvmeeting <br />was made known to the residents in the <br />area <br />where it was considered. If the council wishes to conduct this variance <br />application similarly to Snelling AvenusQhed ledld be meetingpandraskethe contractor <br />to continue <br />this application at its next regularly <br />to notify the neighbors in advance of that meeting. <br />RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: <br />1. Denial of the request for variance to the noise ordinance in conjunction <br />with the Centre Pointe development project; or <br />2. Approval of a variance to a noise ordinance <br />variancesection <br />would2allow0oonstruotion <br />Centre Pointe development project. Said <br />to begin at a.m. on Saturdays. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.