My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01566
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1500-1599
>
pf_01566
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2024 9:44:03 AM
Creation date
2/16/2024 9:42:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1566
Planning Files - Type
Zoning Text Amendment
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 7, 1984 <br />MEMO <br />To: Jim Andre, City Manager <br />From: Bruce E. Ryden, Fire Marshalk_ <br />Subject: Metropolitan Recovery Corporation (MRC) <br />Central Treatment/Recovery Facility <br />At your request, I have reviewed the material that has been made available <br />to me concerning the proposed hazardous waste treatment facility. It is m <br />understanding that this facility will be reclaiming heavy metals (inorganic <br />compounds) received from the metal plating firms. These materials, con- <br />sisting mainly of; lead, zinc, nickel, chrome, copper and cadmium, are <br />classified as toxic or hazardous waste but differ from what the public gen- <br />erally construes as hazardous waste. Should an accidential discharge (spill) <br />occur, the major concern would be from surface soil contamination and water <br />supply contamination. There would be little, if any, airborne contamination. <br />If there were any air contamination, it would be confined to a very small <br />area in the immediate vacinity. Fears by the public of widespread contam- <br />ination are, in my estimation, completely unfounded and based on a lack of <br />knowledge regarding the properties of the hazardous materials. <br />It is also proposed that there will be some collection of organic compounds, <br />principally flammable waste solvents. These will be collected, consolidated <br />and shipped to refineries and licensed disposal sites. There is no proposal <br />at this time to process these compounds on site. <br />The major concerns of this office are as follows: Truck routes used to bring <br />materials in and out of the site, drum storage, fire <br />protectiont <br />contingency plan and illegal dumping. The matter of which streets maraetoybe <br />utilized for transportation into and out of the site could be the same as <br />those currently delineated in Section 34. <br />of additions. The attached map reflects the current60 of the croutesity de with a couple <br />(shown as heavy <br />lines) and the needed additions (shown by slanted lines). The routes are <br />used for explosive carriers and all flammable/combustible transporters except <br />those making deliveries to business, industry and residences. They avoid, <br />to the maximum possible, highly congested residential areas and as much com- <br />mercial area as major through fares will permit. These routes have been in <br />effect since the early 1970's with no adverse affect on the carriers or citi- <br />zens. The small additional routes needed will pose no significant impact on <br />the residents or carriers. <br />The matter of drum storage is a highly important area. <br />can become a severe problem and it is recommended that therebeabsolutelyge <br />no drum storage, full or empty, outside of the building. This should help to <br />eliminate the major problems other hazardous materials sites have experienced. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.