Laserfiche WebLink
M E M O R A N D U M <br />DATE: March 29, 1988 <br />TO: Craig A. Waldron <br />FROM: Rick Jopke Q <br />SUBJECT: Zoning Fee Analysis <br />The following tables provide a quick analysis of zoning related <br />fees. Table 1 is an attempt to analyze the results of a planning <br />fee survey conducted by the city of Coon Rapids in February of <br />1988. 38 communities responded to the survey. <br />It is difficult to draw conclusions about fees because <br />communities structure their fees differently. I have taken an <br />extremely conservative view in Table 1 to attempt to compute <br />average fees. In most cases, actual fees collected would be <br />higher. Even with this conservative approach, Roseville's fees <br />are below average. <br />Table 2 shows two alternative fee schedules and what revenue <br />would be generated assuming that the number and type of <br />applications would be similar to those in 1987 (except as noted). <br />Finally, there are fees which we don't have which we could start <br />charging which could generate additional revenue (i.e. comp plan <br />amendment, shoreline, and PUD) Table 2 also shows what revenue <br />might be generated if we added these fees. <br />