Laserfiche WebLink
' <br />pi'r9ction of j�m��h/D�rtUr@ <br />With the proposed land uses being similar to the existing land <br />use in this <br />area, it was assumed that traffic direction of approach and departure <br />wand <br />�.: <br />the exist' traffic flaws. The existing <br />be consistent with � <br />peakhair <br />traffic its as well as the average daily traffic provided <br />were used to <br />determine this distribution. Figure 5 illustrates the Overall <br />distribution <br />approach and departure of the development's traffic. <br />Iprojected <br />Traffic <br />ZYie development site traffic was assigned to the street syste <br />according to <br />the distribution by direction of approactVdeparture discussed above. Figure <br />6 illustrates the P.M. peak -hour d+evelopnpnt traffic. <br />I <br />Mie 1989 backjr and street traffic volumes were determined by increasing the <br />existing traffic by an wmual growth factor of three percent per year. phis <br />Ifactor is based on the historical increase in traffic in this area. The <br />1989 total traffic was then developed by adding the Proposed develqPTIetZt <br />Itraffic to the background traffic. Figure 7 illustrates 1989 P.M. peak hour <br />intersection bac3cgraund volumes (without site) and total traffic (with <br />site) . <br />1 <br />I <br />11 <br />