My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01877
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1800-1899
>
pf_01877
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2024 9:57:58 AM
Creation date
2/16/2024 9:46:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1877
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
301
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Construction of a permanent residential community of 225 or <br />E e attached units in a second ss city. MEQB Rule #6 <br />V • Reason for EAW preparatioirs . A . R . S 3.038 R . <br />List all mandatory category rule "'s which apply: 3.038 R, 3,038 Q . <br />7 • Estimated construction cost 14,000,000.00 <br />B• Total project area (acres) 18 or length (miles) <br />9 • Number of residential units 297 or commercial, industrial, or institutional square footage <br />1 e Number of proposed parking spaces _ 502 (286 Garage, 216 Surface) <br />ll • List all known local, state and federal permits/approvals/funding required: <br />Level of Government Type of Application Status <br />Federal: None <br />State: Minnesota Pollution Sanitary Sewer Application to be submitted as <br />Controll Agency Extension Permit necessary. <br />Minnesota Dept. Permit for Water Application to be submitted -as <br />of Health Main Connection necessary. <br />Local: City of Roseville PUD Approval Pending review by the Planning <br />Grading Permits Commission & City Council <br />Building Permits <br />12 • Is the proposed project inconsistent with the local adopted comprehensive land use <br />plan or any other adopted plans? ❑ No ® Yes <br />1f yes, explain: <br />A comprehensive plan amendment is being sought by the developer at the <br />August 8, 1988 Roseville City Council Meeting. A plan change is expected <br />at that time. <br />1 3* Describe current and recent past land use and development on and near the site. <br />See attached Exhibit #11 <br />1 4 • <br />Approximately how many acres of the site are In each of the followings categories? <br />(Acreages should add up to total project area before and after construction.) <br />Before After Before After <br />Forest/Wooded 0_ 0 Wetland (types 3.8) 0 -0 <br />Cropland �_ �_ Impervious Surface U <br />' <br />Brush/grassland 11 _ Other (specify) <br />15 0 <br />Describe the soils on the site. giving the SCS soil classification types. if known. <br />Typical soils in the area are a mix of silty sand mixed with gravel. <br />More extensive <br />testing of the soil will be done by standard penetration borings before construction <br />begins. It appears the soils are generally suitable for conventional <br />spread <br />footing foundations. <br />169 <br />Does the site contain peat soils, highly erodible soils. steep slopes, sinkholes, shallow <br />limestone formations. abandoned wells, or any geologic hazards? It yes. show on site <br />map and ® <br />❑ <br />explain: No <br />Yes <br />The site is relatively flat ranging from an elevation of 940 to 942 over 95% <br />of the site with a slight rise to 946 on the northerly portion of the <br />east <br />property line. <br />n 6 • What is the approximate depth (in feet) to: 2 <br />a, groundwater _.—min. avg. b. bedrock.LQQirnin, avg. <br />10'-15, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.