Laserfiche WebLink
• 0 <br />Brutger Companies, Case No. 1877 Page 3 <br />8. To the south the development is across Minnesota Avenue and the <br />egress ramp from the right-of-way for Trunk Highway 36. To the west <br />the development is contiguous to the church site which is affiliated with <br />tho Concordia School facility. To the northwest the property would be <br />dedicated to the City, with most of the land remaining as open <br />recreational facility. Thus, the impact to the north and west is <br />considerably reduced by this fact. <br />To the north of the site there is an existing elementary school and <br />single-family homes. Directly north of the proposed cul-de-sac serving <br />the new single-family homes and the cluster housing is where the school <br />is located. Thus, there would be no direct effect on the existing j <br />residential development to the north of B-2 except to the east and <br />west of the school site. These relationships can be discerned from <br />examination of the various maps prepared indicating the development in <br />that portion of the City. <br />9. Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would involve the designation of <br />the site formally indicated as School to High Density Housing and Public <br />Park. The rezoning is from R-1 to R-3A excluding the proposed park <br />site. It would be possible to retain the proposed 21 home single-family <br />area in the R-1 Zone and rezone portions of the proposed park site so <br />as to obtain the appropriate density. This would offer additional <br />protection to the single-family homes to the east since their property <br />would be contiguous to thy; R-1 Zone land rather than the R-3A Zone. <br />10. Neighborhood meetings have been held with the developer and property <br />owners. We understand that the neighbors are organized in opposition. <br />Attached is a copy of one of the several letters that the City has <br />received. <br />11. Attached are copies of a statement prepared by the Brutger Companies <br />outlining their proposal and a series of drawings illustrating the <br />development concept. We do not have specific elevations of each of <br />the multi -family housing structures, though the perspective sketches that <br />were prepared by Pope Associates give an indication of their character <br />and materials. It would seem as though through the use of innovative <br />tactics .from financing, that the City can obtain title to a much needed <br />and valuable facility without capital outlay. Obviously, this can be an <br />enormous advantage to the City of Roseville and its citizens. Perhaps <br />neighbors in the area,, however, will feel that all of this is being done <br />at their expense. <br />It should be remembered that there are many fine multi -family housing <br />developments in the City of Roseville, most of which are contiguous to, <br />or near single-family development. There are, in fact, many <br />single-family lots in Roseville that back up 'a multi -family housing sites. <br />This change in zone can most successfully occur at the rear lot line of <br />single-family homes. Here, the contiguous single-family homes are being <br />placed adjacent to new single -Family homes, but with smaller lot sizes. <br />One wonders whether this impact would really have a deleterious <br />impact. The applicants propose to develop a "privacy fence" along this <br />joint rear lot line. It would seem as though this technique, if properly <br />handled, could make an effective transition between one type of <br />single-family home and another. <br />