My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01483
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1400-1499
>
pf_01483
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2024 3:30:14 PM
Creation date
2/16/2024 12:26:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1481
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br />CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS <br />City of Roseville <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, Minnesota 55113 <br />Dear Council Person, <br />I am writing to ensure that <br />resolution, Monday, April 9, <br />to. <br />those conditions offered in your <br />1984 for the Noursing Alliance <br />There was no mention of additional public hearings nor was any p <br />made for review of plans, height, set back, landscape, roof stru <br />etc. beyond the staff level. I stand corrected if I missed the <br />cited above. I respectf y rPnuPst that copy of t e resoluti <br />for set back from the easterly property l i ne__Qf—n.at--1-es-s--.#.haa 65 <br />lr ision <br />c ure, <br />provisions <br />on offered <br />ars ruc ure over a o no more an three stories be sent to adjacent <br />property owners and the developer. <br />further, I request that plans include specific definitions as regards <br />height in feet i.f the structure to the top of the visible roof line and <br />to those areas of the structure exposed to public view from any adjacent <br />property including County Road B and Villa Park. The objective is to <br />eliminate unnecessary debate and to place definitions on a common <br />denominator. Further, I believe it to be appropriate for the council, <br />on behalf of the community, to insist on protective covenants to be <br />placed on the property as a condition for approving the rezoning and <br />also the specific project. These protective covenants should include, <br />but not be limited to, the following as a project defined as: . <br />1) Condominiums of market rate or not less than $__, per unit <br />for those persons defined as elderly. <br />2) The project shall contain not less than units, nor more than <br />units, ranging in size from _ to square <br />feet. <br />3) The project shall be exclusively for those eligible for housing for <br />the elderly as originally proposed and shall not be converted to <br />nursing home, hospital, subsidized housing for rent or ownership <br />nor shall it be converted in part or in whole to general apartment <br />use for lease or for sale to the general public. <br />4) The project shall be built and maintained in accordance with <br />those plans approved and dated <br />5) The project shall be built and placed on the site in accordance <br />with the resolution and specifications, set back• height, <br />roof line , landscaping and those conditions stipulated by the <br />planning department and agreed to by the developer, attached hereto <br />and made a part hereof. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.