My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01587-A
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1500-1599
>
pf_01587-A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2024 2:59:16 PM
Creation date
2/16/2024 2:56:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1587-A
Planning Files - Type
Division of Land
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />i ■ <br />Comments <br />This is an application <br />proposed housing units <br />development consists of <br />Street near Oakcrest. <br />$80,000 and $95,000. <br />for FHA Subdivision approval <br />eligible for federal mortgage <br />12 twinhomes on a 3.44 acre <br />The units are expected to be <br />Central Park Twinhomes <br />File No. 12792-1 <br />that would make the <br />insurance. The proposed <br />site located at Fernwood <br />marketed for between <br />The proposed development is compatible with the Roseville Comprehensive Plan <br />reviewed by the Council, and is located in the Metropolitan Urban Service <br />Area. Most necessary and desirable residential services are accessible from <br />this site. Central sewer and water are available and metropolitan interceptor <br />and treatment capacity is adequate. Highway, park, transit, shopping, health <br />and daycare facilities are available nearby. School District 623 has adequate <br />capacity to accommodate the student population that may materialize as a result <br />of this proposed subdivision. <br />No negative impact on the environment or metropolitan services is anticipated <br />if the proposal is implemented. Air and vehicle traffic are not likely to <br />detrimentally affect the intended residential site use. It should be noted <br />that no grading, surface drainage or soil suitability information was provided <br />for this review. Consequently, although no problems are anticipated, any <br />related issues regarding this site were not thoroughly evaluated within the <br />scope of this review. <br />Recommendation <br />This proposal as submitted is consistent with the Council's Housing Review <br />Guidelines and the other applicable policies of the Metropolitan Development <br />Guide. <br />LS429342 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.