My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01524
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1500-1599
>
pf_01524
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2024 3:01:44 PM
Creation date
2/16/2024 2:59:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1524
Planning Files - Type
Division of Land
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMO: September 19, 1984 <br />TO: Ron Moorse, Planning Coordinator <br />FROM: David Drown, Assistant City Engineer /V//X <br />SUBJECT: Sanitary Sewer Easement to serve Grayden Addition Subdivision <br />The proposed Grayden Addition involves the creation of three new <br />lots. The northernmost lot is not currently served directly by <br />a City sanitary sewer. However, a public sewer does exist in a <br />public sewer easement located fifteen (15) feet north of the <br />northernmost parcel. To access this sewer, the existing sanitary <br />sewer easement must be extended 15 feet to the south to abut the <br />subdivision. We have received a letter from the Graydens requesting <br />that the City take those actions necessary to acquire this easement <br />to serve their subdivision. They have agreed to pay for the costs <br />involved. <br />Based on their request, the City determined the extent of the ease- <br />ment required and made contact with the owner of the property in an <br />attempt to negotiate an acquisition. The property owner, a Mrs. <br />Marilyn Baggenstoss, indicated she had no interest whatsoever, in <br />negotiating with the City for an acquisition for an easement. We <br />pointed out the easement involved was only a 15' x 15' square in <br />the extreme southeast corner of her site, and Probably had a value <br />of less than $100.00. We further indicated that if she were unwilling <br />to negotiate for such a purpose, the City did have the power to exer- <br />cise its eminent domain and take the parcel. In view of the small <br />easement and cost involved, we suggested it wasn't worth the fight. <br />Despite these facts, Ms. Baggenstoss indicated she did not wish to <br />discuss an acquisition. <br />Planning Commission and City Council have approved the preliminary <br />plat. However, before approval of the final plat, provisions have to <br />be made to provide adequate public facilities to each parcel. As an <br />alternative to acquiring the above easement, the City could construct <br />an extension to the sanitary sewer as a public improvement of Western <br />Avenue to serve the northernmost lot. Such an action, in my view, is <br />not reasonable, as the costs involved could be something like $15,000- <br />$20,000. Thus, if the City wishes to approve the final plat, it must <br />take action to acquire the necessary sanitary sewer easement. The <br />appropriate action would be for the City Council to adopt a motion <br />instructing the City Attorney to begin condemnation proceedings for <br />the sanitary sewer. Further, the City should either postpone action <br />on the final plat, or receive from the subdivider a deposit or bond <br />in the amount of lk times the estimated costs of the easement, inclu- <br />ding Attorney and condemnation fees for acting on the final plat. I <br />suggest you review this matter with the Graydens prior to referring <br />this matter to the Council. If you have any questions, I will be happy <br />to discuss the matter with you in detail. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.