Laserfiche WebLink
COSTCO WHOLESALE, INC., CASE 1676 <br />Page 3 <br />of streets, and quality landscaping, will attract other viable uses to the <br />area. <br />10. This phenomenon is somewhat akin to what happened when we struggled <br />to place a Target store in the Southdale area. The store was <br />successful and attracted a considerable amount of appropriate and <br />compatible additional development to the area to the south of Southdale <br />over a period of several years. <br />11. An important contribution on the part of the Costco proposal will be <br />the completion of Prior Avenue and Mount Ridge Road. These <br />improvements will be made in accordance with City specifications, <br />including full curb and gutter from County Road C to the north <br />extremity of the Costco property. This represents a significant <br />contribution to the beginning of the process of opening up the properties <br />to the northwest and east. <br />1�. The traffic generated by this facility will likely substantially increase <br />the volume of traffic on County Road C. In our opinion that traffic <br />will not in and of itself overload the street system. However, as other <br />business opportunities develop along County Road C, improvements to its <br />capacity will be required. You will note in the site plan that the <br />access to the Costco development will be via Prior Avenue and Mount <br />Ridge Road only. Thus, there will be no direct driveways onto County <br />Road C. We anticipate that, ultimately, County Road C will be fully <br />divided with median strips from Interstate 35W to Snelling Avenue (and <br />beyond at both ends) providing for left turn movements principally at. <br />public street access points. The Engineering Staff of the City concurs <br />that the access proposed for the Costco site is appropriate and <br />desirable. <br />13. The property is proposed to be rezoned from 1-1 to U' -4. The 8-4 <br />district Is a new district that was designed specifically for the higher <br />Intensity uses proposed in the tax increment districts several years ago. <br />A significant feature of this district Is that a special use permit Is <br />required for site plan approval and 3 percent of the parking area must <br />be landscnped. These are the same standards that have been <br />successfully utilized in the 13-113 District where most of the restaurants <br />are located Immediately west of Rosedale. <br />14. Therefore, we suggest that the d-4 District proposed is the most <br />appropriate and restrictive district adaptable to this site and this area <br />of the City for the use proposed. A terlm of real estate rnarket <br />research people and city planning consultants has been hired by the City <br />to review five areas of the City, one of which includes the area of the <br />property in question. Though we were not Involved in that process and <br />had no knowledge of It being done, we met In our offices with <br />representatives of those companies to inform them of our opinions <br />regarding future land use, circulation roots„ market potential, and other <br />Ideas that we thought might be helpful to the studies. A preliminary <br />report regarding the Costco proposal has been submitted to the City by <br />these consultants as of about the middle of the month. The results of <br />that initial study have not been made available to us, though the <br />Manager notes that it will be available prior to the Planning <br />Commission meeting. <br />