My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01404
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1400-1499
>
pf_01404
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2024 9:06:04 AM
Creation date
2/20/2024 8:51:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1404
Planning Files - Type
Miscellaneous
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 Novenber 1982 <br />PLANNING REPORT <br />CASE NUMBER: 1404-82 and 1405-82 <br />APPLICANT: Roseville Properties <br />LOCATION: North of County Road B-2, East of <br />Cleveland Avenue <br />ACTION REQUESTED: Variance to Front Yard Setback <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br />Fr <br />1.1 Planning File'1404 relates to an office -warehouse building at 1995 County, <br />Road B-2. Planning File 1405 relates to a similar building at 1955 County <br />Road B-2. Attached is a reduced copy of a survey indicating the location <br />ofthese structures on their respective lots. Though four buildings are <br />shown on,the survey, the properties in question are the second from the <br />west,, and the one on the far east side. <br />2. When County Road B-2 was constructed, an 80 foot right-of-way was dedicated <br />rather than the normal 60 foot for a typical roadway. As a concession to <br />this additional dedication, the buildings were allowed to be constructed <br />.30 feet from the.right-of-way rather than the required 40 foot setbaack <br />required An the industrial district. No variance was issued at that time, <br />which makes the building non -conforming. Thus if the buildings are to be <br />expanded, or substantially remodeled, a variance has to be applied for an <br />approved.,first before a building permit could be issued for such work. <br />30 No expansion or change is proposed at this time in the structure. The owner <br />however,, having run into this situation with respect to his recent expansion <br />f <br />in remodeling of the Bell Telephone building (considered two months ago), <br />desires to correct this non -conforming condition at this time. <br />4' The Comprehensive Plan anticipates the ultimate conversion of this area of <br />the City, -to business oriented purposes. All of'the business districts in <br />Roseville (except the Shopping Center District) require a 30 foot front yard <br />setback. Thus, the variance proposed is in keeping with the ultimate <br />standards which may be applied to these structures. The owner understands <br />and anticipates too that over an extended period of time as land values rise, <br />that the redevelopment of this area at some point in time would be.for more <br />intensive business uses. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.