My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01546
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1500-1599
>
pf_01546
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2024 9:23:08 AM
Creation date
2/20/2024 9:19:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1498
Planning Files - Type
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING REPORT <br />DATE: <br />CASE NUMBER: <br />APPLICANT: <br />LOCATION: <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br />3 October 1984 <br />1546-84 <br />Shorewood Corporation, Inc. <br />Northwest Corner of Trunk Highway 36 <br />and Rice Street <br />Approval of Preliminary Plat <br />Variance to Parking Setback <br />1. The Planning Commission and Council, you will recall, have previously <br />approved an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and the rezoning of the <br />property in question to R-3A so as to allow for the construction of a 61 <br />unit multi -family dwelling, and the construction of a small office <br />building at the southeast corner of the site. The applicants now propose <br />to plat the property into four lots as shown on the reduced copy of the <br />preliminary plat attached. <br />Lot 1, east of the Country Kitchen site, is proposed for ultimate <br />expansion of the site which was ,approved at one time by the City but not <br />constructed. We have some concerns with respect to this lot inasmuch as <br />it has no frontage on a public street and should be combined with the <br />existing lot so as to correct this deficiency. Lot 4 is a narrow strip of <br />land which connects the property to Marion Street. It is the proposal of <br />the developers to sell this property to contiguous land owners. You will <br />recall that the Fire Marshall determined that this secondary access would <br />not be necessary for the development of this property. <br />2. The variance relates to the lot line which separates the office building <br />site from the apartment site. This lot line is indicated as an east -west <br />line and should, in our opinion, run down the center of the proposed <br />driveway. This driveway, you will notice has now been modified so as to <br />have a single driveway going down the hill rather than a separate one <br />going to the garage under the building. This new grading plan and <br />arrangement for access and parking, we feel will work well and constitutes <br />a considerable improvement over that previously reviewed with the Planning <br />Commission and Council in their earlier application. <br />3. The engineer reports that additional dedication of 16.5 feet of <br />right-of-way appears not to be clearly indicated on the plat. This should <br />appear as dedication by moving the lot line of Lot 3 westerly 16.5 feet. <br />4. The preliminary plat approval should W conditioned on the dedication of <br />the right-of-way, perhaps the movement of the lot line down the center of <br />the driveway, the filing of appropriate easements for a joint access to <br />the driveway along the south side of the Country Kitchen site and the <br />drive between the apartment site and the proposed office building. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.