pf_01925 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Eugene Shultz, Case . !o. 1925 Page 2 since the existing house to the north is located 20 feet from the property line. Therefore, it is possible to add 10 feet to the 50-foot lot, putting it within the range of a buildable lot had it been established at that width before 1959. 7. The City's ability to turn down ding make the lot unusable and t could may be questionable. In fact, that would well constitute a case of "adverse the City In ofheter buyrdthe if the City turns down a building permit, t Y house B. The applicant, in this case, proposes to build a0 foot wide foot setback n on 60 foot lot, which would conform to the required either side. 9. With respect to the proposed lot of 75 feet in width (north lot), the lots across the street are also 75 feet in width. 10. 11. 12. 13. 15. However, a 65-foot lot is left in the center, which is smaller than the general lot size in the area. From looking at the ccommodated conformingachto ethe r10 foot the house on this lot can be a side yard requirements. Thus, it would appear that three homes can be built (including the one that is there) on the total 200 feet back frontage) requirements. o Each these h would conform to the required side yard set proposed homes would have an attached dublege and appear to be reasonably in scale with the immediateneighborhood. Attached is the applicant's statement outlining his proposal and noting some of the neighbors' concerns. It appears that the neighbors both to ion have some the :youth and northoff the able toroperty expressinthosestconcerns. concerns to the Planning Hopefully they will Commission and Council at the public hearings. The proposed lot division, which according to City regulations should be of handled as a plat, requires dedication of an additional right. -of -way 'for Victoria Street. In accordance with the County's overall thoroughfare plan, this section of Victoria Street is required to be 86 feet in width versus the existing 66 feet. Thus, the lot depth will be approximately 175 feet, and the area of the smallest lot would be 10,500 square feet (175 feet x 60 feet). The minimum lot standard for interior lots is 11,000 square feet. Thc; other solution that might be considered for the development prcposal is that of creating one additional lot to the north which could be as large as 82 feet. This would leave a 10 foot setback on the north side of the existing house. Under 8 feet inthis widthnari$uchhe remainder of a lot would be the land would constitute a lot 11 16 feet wider than the contiguous lots to the south and would be 2 feet smaller than the largest lot in the block. If this proposal is considered for approval, it should be with the condition that the proposed division be handled as a plat, and the existing and new development shall conform to all yard and building requirements and zoning and code requirements. An additional 10 feet (If right-of-way for Victoria Street should also be provided.