Laserfiche WebLink
TRANSPORTATION <br />T/9/84 <br />or the Council as a joint local government , <br />nest is made in a determination of the request's consistency <br />and developer proposal. If a request with regional plans is delayed pending the <br />conjunction with a local plan, it should be a completion of a development impact review. <br />separate report from the plan, but it may The determination is submitted -to the <br />include information from the plan by Technical Advisory Committee for information. <br />reference. <br />6. The implementing agency and Metropolitan 2. The agency contacL'ed in step 1 (implementing Council staffs arrange a development impact <br />agency or Council) notifies the other agency review with the local units of government, <br />(implementing agency or Council) of the affected property owners and developers. <br />request. <br />. Uon completion of the3. The Metropolitan Council and implementing 7 ep ew, a determination ofevethe req lopment impact <br />agency staffs jointly evaluate the request using consistency with regional and local plans is <br />the criteria. The results are forwarded to the established by Council staff and recommended <br />Transportation System Planning Committee to the Metropolitan Council with review and <br />(TSPC) of the Technical Advisory Committee comment by TAC and TAB. <br />(TAC) of the Transportation Advisory Board <br />(TAB) for information. 8. If the Council's determination of consistency <br />with regional plans is positive, the request must <br />4. If the material submitted is sufficient, a deter- become an element in the local .unit of govern- <br />mination of the request's consistency with ment's approved comprehensive plan. The <br />regional plans in the Metropolitan Develop- Council will indicate the general priority of the <br />ment Guide is recommended by the Council request with other interchange requests and <br />staff. A determination will also be made as to major construction/reconstruction needed on <br />the request's consistency with local compre- the metropolitan highway system, using the <br />hensive plans reviewed under the Minnesota criteria in the policy plan and this report. <br />Land Planning Act. <br />9. The request is transmitted to the impJement- <br />5. If evaluation using these criteria and the ing agency, which considers its inclusion in a <br />material originally submitted is not sufficient' study program or implementation program.'.. <br />