Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />C� <br />MEMORANDUM <br />• <br />DATE: 7 May 1986 <br />TO: City Planning Commission and City Council <br />FROM: Howard Dahlgren <br />RE: Amendment to Zoning Ordinance Regarding Residence for <br />Watchman <br />The zoning ordinance for the City of Roseville, since its adoption in March of <br />1959, has included "dwelling units for watchmen" as an accessory use in both <br />Industrial zoning districts. - An accessory use is permitted if a principal use <br />occupies the property. For instance, if you have a residence on a <br />single-family lot, you can park your car and/or build a garage on the <br />property. The parking of the car is not allowed, however, unless the house is <br />there first. Most every suburban community allows a night watchman dwelling <br />unit in industrial districts and many suburban communities allow such a night <br />watchman facility for a business use. <br />At this time, we have <br />wash with an office <br />a request <br />from the developer of a new self-service car <br />Larpenteur Avenue to <br />structure <br />allow a single <br />on the second <br />floor to be constructed on <br />the watchman/manager <br />of the <br />residential <br />unit on the second floor for <br />proposal as to land use, but the <br />car wash. We <br />ordinance does <br />have no problem with this <br />not for <br />use. <br />provide such a mixed <br />We suggest for the Planning Commission andCouncil's consideration the <br />�� <br />amendment of the zoning ordinance to allow a dwelling unit for watchmen" <br />as either an accessory or a special use in business districts. <br />The developers of the car wash/office structure have constructed a similar <br />development in St. Louis Park, including a unit for the watchman/manager. <br />They note that this arrangement has worked extremely well and would like the <br />opportunity to duplicate a similar arrangement in Roseville. <br />Perhaps, if security problems continue to grow as they are in some parts of <br />America, the option of maintaining a resident on premises may be more <br />frequently pursued in the future. <br />