My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01569
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1500-1599
>
pf_01569
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2024 10:29:43 AM
Creation date
2/20/2024 10:19:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1569
Planning Files - Type
Rezoning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t- <br />.R <br />PROCEDURES REGARDING FIELD LOGS <br />LABORATORY DATA SHEETS AND SAMPLES <br />In the process of obtaining and testing samples and preparing this report, <br />procedures are followed that ,,epresent reasonable and accepted practice in <br />the field of soil and foundation engineering. <br />Specifically, field logs are prepared during performance of the drilling and <br />sampling operations which are intended to portray essentially field occur- <br />rences, sampling locations and other information. <br />Samples obtained in the field are frequently subjected to additional testing <br />and reclassification in the laboratory by more experienced soil engineers, and <br />differences between the field logs and the final logs exist. <br />The engineer preparing the report reviews the field and laboratory logs, <br />classifications and test data, and in his judgement in interpreting this <br />data, may make further changes. <br />:samples taken in the field, some of which are later subjected to laboratory <br />tests, are retained in our laboratory for sixty days and are then destroyed <br />unless special disposition is requested by our client. Samples retained over <br />a long period of -time, even in sealed jars, are subject to moisture loss which <br />changes the apparent strength of cohesive soil <br />generally <br />strength from what was originally encountered inthe field�ncSince theyeare <br />no longer representative of the moisture conditions initially encountered, <br />an inspection of these samples should recognize this factor. <br />It is common practice in the soil and foundation engineering profession that <br />field logs and laboratory data sheets not be included in engineering repo is <br />because they do not represent the engineer's final opinions as to appropriate' <br />descriptions for conditions encountered in the exploration and testing work. <br />On the other hand, we are aware that <br />contractors submitting bids or proposals honswork tmight ain ohave canrinte� st sub - <br />studying these documents before submitting a bid or proposal. For this In <br />reason, the field logs will be retained in our office for inspection by all <br />contractors submitting a bid or proposal. We would welcome the opportunity <br />to explain any changes that have and typically are made in the <br />prepar <br />our final reports, to the contractor or subcontractors, before thefirm1On of <br />submits its bid or proposal, and to describe how the information was obtained <br />to the extent the contractor or subcontractor wishes. Results of laboratory <br />tests are generally shown on the boring logs or are described in the text <br />of the report, as appropriate. <br />The descriptive terms and symbols used on the logs are described on the <br />attached sheet, entitled General Notes. <br />STS Consultants. Ltd. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.