My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01555
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1500-1599
>
pf_01555
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2024 11:09:03 AM
Creation date
2/20/2024 11:07:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1555
Planning Files - Type
Variance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING REPORT <br />DATE: <br />CASE NUMBER: <br />APPLICANT: <br />LOCATION: <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br />7 November 1984 <br />1555 -84 <br />William Muska <br />North of Oakcrest, Between Cleveland <br />and Prior Avenues <br />Variance to Front Yard i-arking Setback <br />1. The Muska Lighting Company occupies the structure at 1985 Oakcrest Avenue <br />and has done so for a number of years. They purchased this building and <br />propertyfrom a previous owner and thus did not develop the site <br />themselves. when the property was originally developed, the site was <br />blacktopped to the front property line, and thus does not conform to the <br />20 fcot setback required for parking in the industrial district. <br />As prescribed by Or.inance, the parking setback in that area of the lot <br />between the building and the public street is supposed to have a setback <br />of 40 feet. There is also supposed to be a five foot setback along the <br />side and rear property lines for parking. The asphalt currently extends <br />to the property line along the side and rear property lines. <br />2. Mr. Muska proposes to construct a 34 foot by 48 foot metal building with <br />pole type construction. This building is proposed to be placed at the rear <br />of the lot conforming to the building setback requirement of 20 feet on <br />the site and 20 feet on the rear. Inasmuch as the site is nonconforming <br />due to the lack of conforming to parking setback requirements, the <br />applicant proposes to install new curbing along the parking area <br />contiguous to Oakcrest Avenue and landscape a strip 15 feet in depth north <br />of the Oakcrest right-of-way. Attached are copies of plans indicating the <br />manner in which this is proposed to be done. <br />The installation of this landscaping and curbing represent a good faith <br />effort on the part of Mr. Muska to improve the aesthetic quality of the <br />site. We are aware of preliminary plans being prepared for the <br />development of a new office building on the site directly south of the <br />property in question and Oakcrest Avenue. Thus, the appearance of the <br />front yard on the Muska property will be of some relevance. <br />3. This portion of the industrial area in the city of Roseville is <br />designated on the Comprehensive Plan to be ultimately converted to <br />business uses. If the land were rezoned to business, the parking setback <br />requirement would be 15 feet. Thus, there may be some justification in <br />accepting such a development standard for the Muska property. The <br />preliminary site plan reviewed by the staff for the office structure <br />across the street will have a parking setback of 15 feet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.