My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01984
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1900-1999
>
pf_01984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2024 2:42:39 PM
Creation date
2/20/2024 2:38:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1984
Planning Files - Type
Special Use Permit
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' I <br />Hicks Construction Co., Inc., Case No. 1984 Page 2 <br />application indicates that the total building is to be 1,488 square feet. <br />We have since requested that the applicant indicate the square footage <br />of retail space within the structure be ° approximately purposesof <br />900 this calcusquare lafeet, <br />Assuming the net retail area is <br />the total parking need for the site would <br />lindicates efour plus th three spaces wiPhCea <br />equalling ten spaces. The site plan <br />possible fourth space parallel in front of the building. <br />wed at <br />5. I was on vacation when this site plan i h s theitially applicantieregarding Cour <br />ity <br />Hall, but have since been in contact W <br />concerns for parking. You will note that there is contiguous parking to <br />the north and the west of the site, which is designed to serve the <br />shopping center. We have inquired as to whether or not there is note <br />joint parking arrangement. Even if there is, however, you <br />that the new building is not sited well to be served by parking to the <br />north or the east. <br />6. A possible solution is moving the building further <br />eliminate north <br />the needs fo� <br />provide parking spaces in the fro but makes it more <br />a driveway around the north side of the building, <br />difficult to get into the carwash � r ctu we haves spoken) may aware of the <br />problem, the applicant's architect (wit appropriate <br />able to come up with a revised plan that will provide the appro p <br />parking and a workable circulation solution on the site. <br />7. Based on the layout as it is, and particularly as it relates hat o the the <br />location of the proposed pump islands, U would appear <br />driveway off of Rice Street nearest the intersection could be eliu�minatedd. <br />This driveway appears to direct traffic into the side of a pump <br />islan <br />and mad well be dangerous. <br />8. The proposed location of the trash` receptacle o ilt,hein north our om nionWeb <br />very conspicuous, There is surface parking t <br />making this location very visible. This <br />an would sty ke ahe considerable <br />putting <br />the trash enclosure inside the structure <br />aesthetic improvement. <br />9. No additional street dedication nter ire line of since, the t►roadways)50 foot <br />right-of-way from the section lin a .3 ce <br />both Rice Street and Larpenteur have been <br />submitted. <br />A sidewalk is <br />required and proposed in the site plans <br />10. You will notice that in the elevations of the structures (as indicated otll <br />sheet A-3) that the "back" of the bT�c1�n of courle se, e,lorth do els aide r of conforr�nis slo <br />to be textured, hard board siding. <br />the City's policy of not having cheaper materials onthe so called <br />Collimission <br />"back" side of a building. The P`anningnai to t materials (in this Case <br />wish to consider a condition requiring <br />CO <br />brick) on all four sides. <br />11. In summary, it would appear that a revised plan might be workable on <br />the site providing appropriate parking and circulation, with perhaps a <br />variance to the setback on the north side of the lot. Hopefully, a <br />revised plan cnn Iue prepared for the Planning Commission and Council <br />review at thuir respective public hearings. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.