pf_01984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

' I Hicks Construction Co., Inc., Case No. 1984 Page 2 application indicates that the total building is to be 1,488 square feet. We have since requested that the applicant indicate the square footage of retail space within the structure be ° approximately purposesof 900 this calcusquare lafeet, Assuming the net retail area is the total parking need for the site would lindicates efour plus th three spaces wiPhCea equalling ten spaces. The site plan possible fourth space parallel in front of the building. wed at 5. I was on vacation when this site plan i h s theitially applicantieregarding Cour ity Hall, but have since been in contact W concerns for parking. You will note that there is contiguous parking to the north and the west of the site, which is designed to serve the shopping center. We have inquired as to whether or not there is note joint parking arrangement. Even if there is, however, you that the new building is not sited well to be served by parking to the north or the east. 6. A possible solution is moving the building further eliminate north the needs fo� provide parking spaces in the fro but makes it more a driveway around the north side of the building, difficult to get into the carwash � r ctu we haves spoken) may aware of the problem, the applicant's architect (wit appropriate able to come up with a revised plan that will provide the appro p parking and a workable circulation solution on the site. 7. Based on the layout as it is, and particularly as it relates hat o the the location of the proposed pump islands, U would appear driveway off of Rice Street nearest the intersection could be eliu�minatedd. This driveway appears to direct traffic into the side of a pump islan and mad well be dangerous. 8. The proposed location of the trash` receptacle o ilt,hein north our om nionWeb very conspicuous, There is surface parking t making this location very visible. This an would sty ke ahe considerable putting the trash enclosure inside the structure aesthetic improvement. 9. No additional street dedication nter ire line of since, the t►roadways)50 foot right-of-way from the section lin a .3 ce both Rice Street and Larpenteur have been submitted. A sidewalk is required and proposed in the site plans 10. You will notice that in the elevations of the structures (as indicated otll sheet A-3) that the "back" of the bT�c1�n of courle se, e,lorth do els aide r of conforr�nis slo to be textured, hard board siding. the City's policy of not having cheaper materials onthe so called Collimission "back" side of a building. The P`anningnai to t materials (in this Case wish to consider a condition requiring CO brick) on all four sides. 11. In summary, it would appear that a revised plan might be workable on the site providing appropriate parking and circulation, with perhaps a variance to the setback on the north side of the lot. Hopefully, a revised plan cnn Iue prepared for the Planning Commission and Council review at thuir respective public hearings.