Laserfiche WebLink
To: Rick Jopke, Planning and Zoning Administrator <br />From: Karl P. Keel, As <br />sistant Public Works Director\sa% <br />Re: Minnesota Solvents building permit plans dated <br />May 8, 1989 <br />Date.: May 16, 1989 <br />Upon review of Minnesota Solvents application for a building <br />plans dated May 8, 1989, the <br />permit at 234Q Rose Place, comments <br />engineering department would like to offer the following <br />and recommendations: <br />1, 1t is our understanding <br />that the current city ordinances <br />require an entire facilityto e oneuwouldnto expectfthatnthe <br />during an expansion. Therefore, concrete curb. <br />entire parking lot decurbboth <br />should beand <br />installed so that all <br />setbacks conform <br />The new pavement (the existing gravel loading area is up <br />to the property line on the west side). <br />2. We would like to have more information about <br />uour sathe effluent <br />to <br />be dischargefrom the informationwwilllbenused by the MWCC to <br />y sewer <br />system. Thissewer charges. <br />collect additional sanitary <br />3. Considering the potential environmental <br />teffehe cts Of <br />chemical <br />spills, the developer should both pave <br />onding for spill <br />area and provide adequate on -sire p <br />containment. The containment��ae�ethodlto stopdspblls from <br />adequate volume for spills and <br />entering the surrounding stormwater system. <br />4. Please investigate the city's <br />granted prior to the issuance <br />would seem that by issuing a <br />allowing the use. <br />legal position if a permit is <br />of a special use permit. It <br />permit, the city is in essence <br />It is the engineering department's recommendation <br />permit not be issued until the above listed items <br />satisfactorily addressed <br />that a building <br />have been <br />