pf_01924 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

PLANNING REPORT DATE: 3 May 1989 (This report was tabled from the 5 April 1989 meeting.) CASE NUMBER: 1924 Lorraine St. Louis APPLICANT: LOCATION: West Side of St. Croix Street, North of County Road B (see sketch) ACTION REQUESTED: Division of Platted Lot PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 1. This property is a portion of Lot 4 of o Block we of side Todd'sOutSt. Lots.Croix The property has 161 feet of frontage Street and a depth of 237 feet• The property property.oc Attached upied y isaa existing home built on the south portro P copy of the section map on which we have indicated the property in question. Lot 4, as originally platted, is indicated in a light gray pattern. 2. Attached is a COPY of a survey prepared by Advance Surveying and Engineering Co. which indicates the proposal to divide the land into two lots. The south 81 feet would be occupied by the existing home and the north 80 feet is proposed as a lot to bl- sold. Also attached is a copy of a staternent from Lorraine St. Louis noting her request. 3. The normal minimum lot frontage for an area !lt rior 11,000ot (as is the C880 sq jarcfact. The here) is 85 feet. The rrlinrrnurr lot lot width proposed is 80 fe-t in width and has a I�.L area of 18,�5Ei square feet. 11. You will dote thtfrt the section (nal) :lttachrnp �� rt* pattern In tile indicates et generalarea. property in gIM50or1, `3 well pu 75 The lots across thy: street, replatted irr tf�li� last dry �zldt�, lsa a 10rY 4rt�foot feet and feet in width to 06 fciet in width. The lot across from tilt- existing horne ... There ,y rej,j twowitiaddi ional lots os to the r'lorth of the prOpertY rr, x�t�c.,►t , frontage. >. Thus, it vrrlulci � t, :r91 that the prupost.*d lets rare reasonably ill 5"110 with at least af�rrl� of tile loll in the 01'1110diOtc- r rrrr=4:l. It wou'Ll s�}�ri`l, I.l�efl, that the proposal merits careful conIc3craClo �o r�tiorl of t 9ZIra9c, the 6. flue to tale fortunate 10c)l - }e� s requirementssetl.)tickrsand it e►xistil)g structure (tail the 81 focat 10 rl c t t� woulc9 rippear that the proposed 80 foot lot could du s o as well- ,]IVi°.itar� caf the r �; ��ti •�.1,ii1 n�irsl �levc'ltatl�al)ll' f Garnlilt.