My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01915
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1900-1999
>
pf_01915
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2024 4:35:59 PM
Creation date
2/20/2024 4:34:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1915
Planning Files - Type
Division of Land
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SCott & Debbie Nelson <br />1027 W. Co. Rd. B <br />Roseville, MN 55113 <br />November 29, 1988 <br />To Whom It May Concern: <br />I am including this letter with my application ication for a lot division <br />iv s iu nmay have <br />to more <br />fully explain my intentions <br />e and <br />ootisfy any questions <br />regarding my future plans fo <br />ce <br />My <br />wife Debra and myself have lived at 1027 W. County Road <br />adly hasn grown <br />purchased this home, our first, in October of lwe <br />g years old; <br />quickly since then and we currently haveRich, <br />also expecting our faurth child in <br />q ears and Mark, .i years. We are <br />Robbie, 6 y <br />e more <br />February. As our family has grown our present 2-b dh°nk aboutaleavinig this <br />and more crowded and as as we hated a larger homet�- and soon. <br />neighborhood we decided we needed <br />For ser ye <br />ars ears Deb and I have discussed ways of addingors toon o our existing <br />the <br />home and have even gore so far T�1eta1ebring in result of discussions was a <br />ractbuilding and suggest additions. <br />decisi <br />on that, because of the configuration of the house, it would not be <br />feasible to remodel or add on to our home. <br />Ever since <br />we moved in to our home we have wondered about tihe possibility <br />restraining s i us <br />Of <br />building a new home in our own backyard. sze0ne of the resulting fromsplittingoff our <br />from attempting this was that the 1 area and also would <br />own backyard would not be large enough to give us a play <br />not conform to the neighborhood. <br />About five ears ago I met with your City Staff about rthitso proposal <br />up width they <br />suggested <br />Y <br />suggested trying to buy some land from <br />dmI neighbors <br />soclosely as possible to <br />acceptable lot size. Your staff suggested <br />adhere to the genera 1 l o l. s i ze and con f i gurat i d unusualnow size ze and shapes lots <br />Since the entire neighborhood is made up of varied <br />tht had <br />we immeiateldecided to undertake a split very similar to the oneastaacrossa0xford from <br />done to the identical size parcel f 1 t� o aldmost exactly the same size lots <br />us. This land now has three <br />I am proposing. <br />When earlier this year we learned that our neighbors at 1035 contactedRoad B, <br />themthe <br />W . <br />Tim and Jody Yungers, wauldlandsfromn9hem1eSinceechat time I have entered into <br />possibility of buying some <br />a purchase agreement with them to buy their hone and therefore acquire the <br />needed land for an optimal lot split. <br />The <br />actual lot split I am proposing is to create a third to froa new septhe arate <br />inal <br />two by splitting off the northern 8mensionsf of �ranproximately I94' x 60 feet. <br />parcel (pA" wouldthe <br />face eastwith <br />antodOxford. <br />This new lot <br />As soon as possible following the lot split I will re -sell nti1the Ynewe hawse me. <br />Tim and Jody will continue a o occupy this home u <br />finished sometime in mid-Janu y• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.