pf_01915 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

PLANNING REPORT 4 January 1989 DATE: 1915 CASE NUMBER: Scott Edward Nelson APPLICANT: Northwest Corner of County LOCATION: Road B and Oxford (see sketch) ACTION REQUESTED: Division of Platted Lot PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: The Nelson's have lived at the northwest corner of .88 CountyRoad of d rB and Oxford Street since 1977 and occupy a lot with 9 The age on County Road B and a depth 197.63 feet (alor►gof frontageoxfordStr et)County property to the west of then; also has 96.88 fe Was owned by Tim and Road B and a similar depth. This property Jody Yungers who are currently building a new f oustehe iC,tRjseville. (Jody is the Assistant Park and Recreation Director 2. The Nelsons, who now own both of these lots, propose to develop a new lot fronting on Oxford Street utilizing ar the bnortherly i S0 feet f each lot. Attached is a survey prep Y Associates, Inc. indicating the dimensions of the existing lot, the . `ions of the two houses on there, and the proposal for the new lot loc on the north end. 3. The new lot will have 80 feet of frontage and he depth of 194lot.1 oneetthe equalling a land area of 15,536 square feet. corner will have 11,396 square feet and the lot suet for as corner lot west is will have 11,410 square feet. The minimum to Eighty-five feet 100 feet of frontage and 12,500 square feet of area. of frontage is required with 11,000 square feet of land area for interior lots. 4. The City's policy has been to allow lot divisions less than the normal standards- if such lots are of reasonable scale O with development in the directly immediate area. In this case, there is an across the street on Oxford Street. In fact, tthattselo b t wachcreated Nelson's. the exact same manrer as the arrangement proposed y o! two That is, athird lot •:gas created utilizing the northerly portion existing luts fronting or, (,ounty Road B. 5. Attached is a statement frorn the Nelson's outli ,to t�uildheir proposale on and for this request. They pcopose tho their reasons r in the neighborhood and community, new lot so that they can ,stay 9 which appears to be a prime objective on their part. nybers of t 6. It would be helpful if me` i Commission existing ' struct esu►and review this property since the locutrun the s 9nificant coniferous treu yruwth on the property enhances the development as proposed. 1.